Substitution of variables to remove singularities.

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
Mait
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am given an integral for which I need to substitute variables to remove a singularity so that the integral can be computed in Matlab using the Composite Trapezoidal Method, and then compared to the integral computed in Maple to 16 digit precision. I am stuck on the variable substitution. The integral is:

[itex]\int_0^1 \frac{e^{-x}}{x^{3/4}}\,dx[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted the following substitution:
[itex]du= \frac {dx}{x^{3/4}}[/itex] so that [itex]u=4x^{1/4}[/itex] which resulted in the integral:
[itex]\int_0^4 e^{ -{\frac{u^4}{256}}}\,du[/itex]

Which doesn't seem to work at all. I suspect the error is in the substitution of variables. Any help/input would be fantastic.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mait said:

Homework Statement


I am given an integral for which I need to substitute variables to remove a singularity so that the integral can be computed in Matlab using the Composite Trapezoidal Method, and then compared to the integral computed in Maple to 16 digit precision. I am stuck on the variable substitution. The integral is:

[itex]\int_0^1 \frac{e^{-x}}{x^{3/4}}\,dx[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted the following substitution:
[itex]du= \frac {dx}{x^{3/4}}[/itex] so that [itex]u=4x^{1/4}[/itex] which resulted in the integral:
[itex]\int_0^1 e^ {\frac{u^4}{64}}\,du[/itex]

Which doesn't seem to work at all. I suspect the error is in the substitution of variables. Any help/input would be fantastic.

i) what happened to the minus sign in the exponential? ii) x isn't u^4/64. Check that '64'. And iii) when you go to the u integration, you'd better change the x limits to u limits.
 
Hey, the missing minus and 64 were typos. I changed x to equal u^4/256 and included the minus sign, and then changed the limits of integration from 0 to 1 to 0 to 4, but still no luck.
 
Mait said:
Hey, the missing minus and 64 were typos. I changed x to equal u^4/256 and included the minus sign, and then changed the limits of integration from 0 to 1 to 0 to 4, but still no luck.

Then it should be ok. How do you mean, 'no luck'?
 
The assignment said that removing the singularity would make it doable in Maple but all Maple is returning for me is a series of WhittakerM functions, which I am not familiar with. Perhaps the assignment made it seem to simple and more legwork is required.
 
Dick, the remaining issue was in my coding in Maple. Thank you very much for your help, it was great.