Suction related to opening a door quickly

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bassplayer142
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Suction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon observed when opening two doors in quick succession, particularly focusing on the concept of suction and the work involved in opening both doors. Participants explore the mechanics of air pressure, force, and energy transfer in this context, examining whether the work done is cumulative or independent for each door.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that opening the first door quickly creates suction that helps open the second door, questioning whether the work done is the sum of both doors or just one.
  • Another participant clarifies that the work done in opening a door is independent of the second door, attributing the effect to momentum applied to the air, which reduces pressure and allows the second door to open.
  • A different viewpoint introduces the concept of a continuous siphon effect, likening the scenario to a series of doors opening with a single push, suggesting that a small pressure difference can trigger the opening of the second door.
  • One participant agrees that the second door would require the same amount of work to close as it did to open, indicating a reciprocal relationship in the work done.
  • Another participant reiterates the initial observation, agreeing that both doors are effectively opened simultaneously, but disputes the term "suction," instead describing the air as a compressible medium that behaves like a spring.
  • One participant expresses a newfound understanding of the concept, acknowledging the potential for suction while also considering the mechanics of pushing versus pulling the first door.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of suction versus air pressure dynamics in the process of opening the doors. There is no consensus on whether the work done is cumulative or independent, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact mechanics involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various physical concepts such as force, momentum, pressure differences, and energy transfer, but the discussion does not resolve the underlying assumptions or definitions related to these concepts.

bassplayer142
Messages
431
Reaction score
0
Say you go into a building where you open one door walk a few feet and open another door. I have noticed that if you open the first door fast the other door obviously opens due to suction? Basically are you doing the work it requires to open two doors or basically the summation of the work of opening both doors?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The work one does in opening the door is simply the force applied by one integrated over the distance applied. That work has nothing to do with the second door.

When opens a door rapidly, one is both moving the mass of the door and applying momentum to the air in front of the door. That momentum applied to the air briefly displaces the air and reduces the pressure behind it (suction). The reduced air pressure in the chamber between two doors allows the higher pressure on the back side of the second door to push it open.
 
That is based on a force impulse. The siphon is continuous. It would be analogous to hundreds of doors opening one by one with only one push. One way to explain this scenario, is each door has potential energy within a trigger release spring. All it will take is a small pressure difference to release this spring energy. That will make the pressure pulse for the door, etc.,

This affect is common to chemical reactions. The reactants, before they can lower energy need to climb an activation energy hill. The spring is the difference between starting and final products. The activation energy is supplied by the final affect, with the result one gets more energy out than needed to activate the process. The current theory goes from start to finish directly. But nature uses an activation hump, with the energy to overcome the hump supplied by the final affect. That assumes one is trying to get a chain reaction for lowering potential, sort of like a siphon.
 
So then the second door that swung open would have the same amount of work as it closes. thanks you guys.
 
bassplayer142 said:
Say you go into a building where you open one door walk a few feet and open another door. I have noticed that if you open the first door fast the other door obviously opens due to suction? Basically are you doing the work it requires to open two doors or basically the summation of the work of opening both doors?

Yes exactly, you are indeed opening both doors instead of one. but its not suction.

It's just that the object (air) carrying the force from one door to the other is noticeably compressible. It's identical to having both doors connected by a spring.

The speed dependence is obviously due to air escaping easily past the opening you made in the fist door only if you open it slowly enough. Open it quick and the air acts like a spring before it can escape.
 
Ahhhh, I feel like I understand it a lot better. Thanks to all.
 
bassplayer142 said:
Ahhhh, I feel like I understand it a lot better. Thanks to all.

Oops, the mechanism could be suction, its just when I visualised it I assumed you'd pushed the first door rather than pulled on it.
But it all works out the same really, in my opinion you are simply opening both doors at the same time so it requires twice the amount of effort to both doors quickly than it does to open one door slowly.
i.e. twice the amount of energy is needed if the air is trapped, because you're actually opening both at once.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 212 ·
8
Replies
212
Views
17K