Sum of cubes - please verify my proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter iainfs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Sum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the formula for the sum of cubes, specifically \(\sum^{2n}_{r=1} r^3 = n^2(2n+1)^2\), using mathematical induction. Participants are exploring different approaches to simplify the algebraic manipulation involved in the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts a proof by induction but seeks a more efficient algebraic method. Some participants suggest re-expressing terms in a way that simplifies the algebra, such as changing variables. Others question the applicability of the formula for non-integer values of \(n\).

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the proof, offering alternative methods and questioning the assumptions regarding the values of \(n\). There is recognition of a potentially more elegant approach, but no consensus has been reached regarding the broader applicability of the formula.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about whether the formula holds for all \(2n\) in the natural numbers, with some participants suggesting that \(n\) could take on non-integer values, which raises questions about the initial conditions of the proof.

iainfs
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove

[tex]\sum^{2n}_{r=1} r^3 = n^2(2n+1)^2[/tex]

by mathematical induction.

My proof is below but it is rather long winded. Is there a quicker way of doing the algebraic manipulation? Preferably one that forgoes the polynomial division and multiplying out all the brackets!

The Attempt at a Solution


Base case, [tex]n=1[/tex]:

[tex]\sum^{2 \times 1}_{r=1} r^3 = 1^2 (2 \times 1+1)^2 = 1 \times 9 = 9[/tex]

[tex]= 1^3 + 2^3 = 1 + 8 = 9[/tex]

Inductive step, assume true for [tex]n=k, \quad k \in \mathbb{N}[/tex]

[tex]\sum^{2k}_{r=1} r^3 = k^2(2k+1)^2[/tex]

Adding the next two terms, [tex]n=k+1[/tex]

[tex]\sum^{2(k+1)}_{r=1} r^3 = k^2(2k+1)^2 + (2k+1)^3 + (2k+2)^3[/tex]

Multiplying out and collecting terms
[tex]\sum^{2k+2}_{r=1} r^3 = 4k^4 + 20k^3 + 37k^2 + 30k + 9[/tex]

By factor theorem, (k+1) is a factor.
By long-hand polynomial division

[tex]= (k+1)(4k^3 + 16k^2 + 21k + 9)[/tex]

By factor theorem, (2k+3) is a factor.
By long-hand polynomial division

[tex]= (k+1)(2k+3)(2k^2 + 5k + 3)[/tex]

Factorising the quadratic
[tex]= (k+1)(2k+3)(2k+3)(k+1)[/tex]
[tex]= (k+1)^2(2k+3)^2[/tex]
[tex]= (k+1)^2(2(k+1)+1)^2[/tex]

So if the statement is true for [tex]n=k[/tex], it is true for [tex]n=k+1[/tex].
Therefore
[tex]\sum^{2n}_{r=1} r^3 = n^2(2n+1)^2[/tex]
for all [tex]n \geq 1, \quad n \in \mathbb{N}[/tex]

Thanks for any suggestions on making this simpler.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi iainfs

how about this

[tex]\sum^{2(k+1)}_{r=1} r^3 = k^2(2k+1)^2 + (2k+1)^3 + (2k+2)^3[/tex]

Then re-write everything in terms of k+1

[tex]\sum^{2(k+1)}_{r=1} r^3 = ((k+1)-1)^2(2(k+1)-1)^2 + (2(k+1)-1)^3 + (2(k+1))^3[/tex]

then to make the algebra simpler change variable to m = k+1
[tex]\sum^{2(k+1)}_{r=1} r^3 =\sum^{2m}_{r=1} r^3 = (m-1)^2(2m-1)^2 + (2m-1)^3 + (2m)^3[/tex]

and then group terms and see where we end up
[tex]\sum^{2m}_{r=1} r^3 = ((m-1)^2 + (2m-1))(2m-1)^2 + (2m)^3[/tex]
[tex]= m^2(2m-1)^2 + (8m)m^2[/tex]
[tex]= m^2((2m-1)^2 + 8m)[/tex]
[tex]= m^2((4m^2 -4m +1) + 8m)[/tex]
[tex]= m^2(4m^2 +4m +1)[/tex]
[tex]= m^2(2m +1)^2[/tex]
...sweet

I always find that variable change always makes it easier for me...
 
Thank you! Knew there would be a more elegant way.
 
Doesn't this work for all 2n in N too? (not just n in N) for 2n>=1.
Because adding (2n+1)^3 to both sides gives,
Sum(from r=1 to 2n+1) of r^3
= n^2*(2n+1)^2+(2n+1)^3
=(2n+1)^2*(n+1)^2
=((2n+1)/2))^2+((2n+1)+1)^2
and the initial cases of 2n=1, 2n=2, 2n=3 all work.
 
hsarp71 said:
and the initial cases of 2n=1, 2n=2, 2n=3 all work.

n is an integer, so not too sure what you mean by 2n=3
 
no I'm saying that it works for all 2n in N. so n does not have to be an integer for this to work- n can be 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2,...
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K