Sum of cubes - please verify my proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter iainfs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the formula for the sum of cubes, \sum^{2n}_{r=1} r^3 = n^2(2n+1)^2, using mathematical induction. The initial proof presented is lengthy, prompting suggestions for simplification through variable changes and algebraic manipulation. One proposed method involves rewriting terms in relation to k+1 and changing variables to m, which streamlines the algebra. The conversation also touches on the applicability of the proof for all values of 2n in the natural numbers, suggesting that it holds even for non-integer values of n. Overall, the participants seek a more elegant approach to the proof while confirming its validity across a broader range of n.
iainfs
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove

\sum^{2n}_{r=1} r^3 = n^2(2n+1)^2

by mathematical induction.

My proof is below but it is rather long winded. Is there a quicker way of doing the algebraic manipulation? Preferably one that forgoes the polynomial division and multiplying out all the brackets!

The Attempt at a Solution


Base case, n=1:

\sum^{2 \times 1}_{r=1} r^3 = 1^2 (2 \times 1+1)^2 = 1 \times 9 = 9

= 1^3 + 2^3 = 1 + 8 = 9

Inductive step, assume true for n=k, \quad k \in \mathbb{N}

\sum^{2k}_{r=1} r^3 = k^2(2k+1)^2

Adding the next two terms, n=k+1

\sum^{2(k+1)}_{r=1} r^3 = k^2(2k+1)^2 + (2k+1)^3 + (2k+2)^3

Multiplying out and collecting terms
\sum^{2k+2}_{r=1} r^3 = 4k^4 + 20k^3 + 37k^2 + 30k + 9

By factor theorem, (k+1) is a factor.
By long-hand polynomial division

= (k+1)(4k^3 + 16k^2 + 21k + 9)

By factor theorem, (2k+3) is a factor.
By long-hand polynomial division

= (k+1)(2k+3)(2k^2 + 5k + 3)

Factorising the quadratic
= (k+1)(2k+3)(2k+3)(k+1)
= (k+1)^2(2k+3)^2
= (k+1)^2(2(k+1)+1)^2

So if the statement is true for n=k, it is true for n=k+1.
Therefore
\sum^{2n}_{r=1} r^3 = n^2(2n+1)^2
for all n \geq 1, \quad n \in \mathbb{N}

Thanks for any suggestions on making this simpler.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi iainfs

how about this

\sum^{2(k+1)}_{r=1} r^3 = k^2(2k+1)^2 + (2k+1)^3 + (2k+2)^3

Then re-write everything in terms of k+1

\sum^{2(k+1)}_{r=1} r^3 = ((k+1)-1)^2(2(k+1)-1)^2 + (2(k+1)-1)^3 + (2(k+1))^3

then to make the algebra simpler change variable to m = k+1
\sum^{2(k+1)}_{r=1} r^3 =\sum^{2m}_{r=1} r^3 = (m-1)^2(2m-1)^2 + (2m-1)^3 + (2m)^3

and then group terms and see where we end up
\sum^{2m}_{r=1} r^3 = ((m-1)^2 + (2m-1))(2m-1)^2 + (2m)^3
= m^2(2m-1)^2 + (8m)m^2
= m^2((2m-1)^2 + 8m)
= m^2((4m^2 -4m +1) + 8m)
= m^2(4m^2 +4m +1)
= m^2(2m +1)^2
...sweet

I always find that variable change always makes it easier for me...
 
Thank you! Knew there would be a more elegant way.
 
Doesn't this work for all 2n in N too? (not just n in N) for 2n>=1.
Because adding (2n+1)^3 to both sides gives,
Sum(from r=1 to 2n+1) of r^3
= n^2*(2n+1)^2+(2n+1)^3
=(2n+1)^2*(n+1)^2
=((2n+1)/2))^2+((2n+1)+1)^2
and the initial cases of 2n=1, 2n=2, 2n=3 all work.
 
hsarp71 said:
and the initial cases of 2n=1, 2n=2, 2n=3 all work.

n is an integer, so not too sure what you mean by 2n=3
 
no I'm saying that it works for all 2n in N. so n does not have to be an integer for this to work- n can be 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2,...
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top