Sum of Infinite Series via Unit Step Integration? Or Not?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the sum of an infinite series represented by the expression [sum of; n=1; to infinity] ((2y)^n)/(n(n!)). Participants explore the possibility of using unit step integration to evaluate this series and express their uncertainties regarding the method.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the sum of the series to an improper integral using unit step integration but expresses confusion about the method. Other participants question the validity of "unit step integration" and suggest alternative approaches, such as manipulating the series and relating it to known functions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some offering guidance on potential methods to approach the series. There is recognition of the exponential integral's relevance, though the original poster indicates a lack of understanding regarding its application.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's difficulty with Riemann sums and the exponential integral, indicating a gap in foundational knowledge that may affect their ability to proceed with the problem.

Oijl
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[sum of; n=1; to infinity] ((2y)^n)/(n(n!))


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


If there were a way to find the improper integral of f(x) = ((2c)^x)/(x(x!)) from one to infinity using unit step integration (c is just a constant), then that would equal the sum, right? Well, I don't know how to do unit step integration, besides by tedious Riemann sums, but I can't do those to infinity. So, an explanation on unit step integration, or some other method of finding the sum of this series, is what I've been looking for for a while now.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no such thing as "Unit step integration", and rightly so - that's *exactly* the same as taking summations. And if you were to set up the Riemann sums with unit widths, you would get the summation again.

To sum the series, it would probably be best to let 2y= x, and find the derivative of the general term with respect to x. With some manipulation you should see that is just a constant times the general term of quite a well known series. I'm sure you can do the rest. Good luck and welcome to PF!

EDIT: O damn it. It seems the result is only in terms of the Exponential integral. Hopefully you don't mind that? http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ExponentialIntegral.html. Either you use this method to see why in turns out that way, or you "recognize" the series.
 
Last edited:
Shoot. I mean, of course thank you. It's just that I don't understand the exponential integral. I've looked at it and stuff, because I keep coming across it trying to solve this problem, but I guess I don't see how to apply it to my problem. It's the integral from -∞ to x of (e^t / t)dt? That... seems to be how it's defined, but I don't think I yet understand what it actually is. What is this thing, what does it represent, how should it be applied here?
 
The exponential integral function Ei(x) is just a special function of x. You'll find it's relation with your series here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_integral If you followed what Gib suggested you'll know that your series is represented by a function whose antiderivative is (exp(x)-1)/x and whose value at x=0 is 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K