Sum of n elements of a finite set of integers, 1 through s

Nessalc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The general problem I'm trying to solve is the probability of rolling a total t on n s-sided dice. A good chunk of the problem is easy enough, but where I run into difficulty is this:

How many combinations of dice will yield a sum total of t? Because the number set is limited, {a \choose n-1} (where a={n(s+1) \over 2} - \left|{n(s+1) \over 2} - t\right|) no longer works when n+s \leq t \leq (n-1)s. It is this region in the middle that interests me. Enumerating all combinations could be time-consuming, and, I expect, is entirely unnecessary. Is there a known formula for computing these numbers?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sum of the m rolls diverges as m gets large. but we can use standardize to make it converge to standard normal distribution. this the weak law of large number says.
 
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. The total t must be in the range [n, ns]. I am aware of the idea that it would probably converge to a normal distribution, but for {1 \over {\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2}}} e^{-{{\left((x-{n(s+1) \over 2})-\mu\right)^2} \over {2\sigma^2}}}, what would \sigma and \mu be in terms of n, s and t?
 
That's exactly what I was looking for, thanks!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top