Sum of ordinates mean value of functions

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the concept of mean values of functions, particularly in relation to the sum of ordinates and their connection to areas under curves. The mean value of a function over an interval is described as the average value of y, with the sum of ordinates representing the area above the x-axis. Clarification is sought on whether ordinates are taken at discrete or continuous values, emphasizing that the sum of y-values must be defined appropriately for real-valued functions. The relationship between integrals and mean values is explained through the analogy of mass density, where the integral represents total mass over an interval. The confusion arises from the terminology "sum of ordinates," which is deemed less clear than the explanation provided in external resources.
Appleton
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble deciphering the opening gambit of an explanation of mean values of functions. It begins as follows:

"Consider the part of the curve y = f(x) for values of x in the range a ≤ x ≤ b."

A graph is shown with a curve cutting the x-axis at c with a shaded positive area bounded by the curve and the line x=a to the left of c and a shaded negative area bounded by the curve and the line x = b to the right of c.

"The mean value of y in this range is the average value of y for that part of the curve.
The sum of the ordinates (ie values of y) between x= a and x = c occupies the shaded area above the x-axis and is positive.
This area is ∫acy dx
Hence the sum of the ordinates between x = a and x= c is ∫acy dx"

I understand that an ordinate is the value of y. But are the ordinates taken at integer values of x or continuous values of x. I don't see how the sum of ordinates is equal to the value of the area under the curve. I must have misunderstood the definition of the sum of the ordinates.
I can see how the sum of the continuous ordinates multiplied by change in x as change in x goes to 0 might equal the area under the curve.

Sorry if my terminology and description of the graph leave a lot to be desired.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's indeed meaningless to speak of the sum of all the y coordinates of the graph of a function that is defined on interval of real numbers. unless you define "sum" to be something besides an ordinary arithmetic sum.

To argue the relation between an integral and a mean value in a better way, consider that "mean mass per unit length" is defined by a relation such as (total length of interval )(mean mass per unit length) = total mass

Think of a f(x) as being "mass density" Then you just need to understand why the integral of a mass density over an interval is the total mass of the interval.

You book could have said "Think of f(x) as being a density of something. Then \int_a^b f(x) dx is the total something in the interval [a,b] and \frac{ \int_a^b f(x) dx}{ [b-a]} is the mean something per unit length = the mean density.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K