What is the true essence of the universe beyond human perception?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tommahawk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The essence of the universe extends beyond human perception, encompassing all matter, energy, space, and time, along with the laws that govern them. The discussion emphasizes that existence is independent of human awareness or belief, challenging the notion that perception defines reality. It argues that the universe includes everything that exists, regardless of human knowledge. This perspective suggests a definition of the universe that does not rely on scientific understanding. Ultimately, the universe is a comprehensive entity that exists beyond our sensory experiences.
Tommahawk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My one sentence take is

The character, properties, behaviour, receptiveness of aspects of the universe interact and react to produce the process of the functional system that is our universe and as it is.

How would you summarize the universe?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Courtesy of Wikipedia:

The Universe comprises everything we perceive to physically exist, the entirety of space and time, all forms of matter and energy, and the physical laws and constants that govern them.
 
"everything we perceive to physically exist." The word "perceive" doesn't belong there. Whether or not we perceive something is irrelevant. The existence of things is independent of what anyone senses, knows or believes. The universe is everything that exists everywhere, whether or not anyone knows about them.
 
mikelepore said:
"everything we perceive to physically exist." The word "perceive" doesn't belong there. Whether or not we perceive something is irrelevant. The existence of things is independent of what anyone senses, knows or believes. The universe is everything that exists everywhere, whether or not anyone knows about them.

So this would be the definition that does not require Science necessarily?
 

Thread 'Matter density right after the decoupling'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
View full post »

Thread 'Hubble Constant, Dark Energy and the Expanding Universe'

Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
View full post »

Similar threads

B Conflict between the conservation of matter and the rapid expansion of our universe
Replies
18
Views
729
B Estimates — True Size of the Universe?
Replies
17
Views
3K
I 3 questions about a paper on density fluctuations in the Universe
Replies
1
Views
2K
B What is Consciousness? How does it affect our Physical Universe?
Replies
6
Views
2K
B How can the Observable Universe be a closed system?
Replies
37
Views
6K
I How does the Singularity produce all the diverse matter in the universe?
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Low entropy early Universe and the heat death musings
Replies
5
Views
3K
B The observable and non-observable parts of the Universe
Replies
38
Views
6K
B Expansion or Attraction: What's Driving Our Universe?
Replies
24
Views
3K
I Is Superdeterminism the Key to Understanding Our Universe?
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top