Summing Positive Integers with 2^r3^s

  • Thread starter Thread starter sachinism
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Positive
AI Thread Summary
Every positive integer can be expressed as a sum of numbers in the form 2^r3^s, where r and s are nonnegative integers, and no summand divides another. The discussion highlights the use of induction to establish this property, noting the importance of ensuring that no summand divides another. A proposed method involves showing that if integers less than n can be represented in this form, then n can also be represented. However, some participants point out limitations in this approach, particularly for certain integers. Recursion is suggested as a more effective strategy for tackling the problem, especially for integers not divisible by 2 or 3.
sachinism
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Show that every positive integer is a sum of one or more numbers of the form 2^r3^s, where r and s are nonnegative integers and no summand divides another.

not my doubt

just found it interesting so posted here :smile:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Using induction (1 = 20 30; assuming that k can be written in such a way, then so can k + 1) is the easy part.
You only need to exercise some care with the part that "no summand divides another."

So assuming that all k < n can be written as requested, suppose that you get two terms 2r 3s + 2r + r' 3s + s' and show that they can be written as 2a 3b + 2a' 3b' for appropriate a, b, a' and b'.
 
nice one man , exactly what i had in mind

congo
 
CompuChip said:
So assuming that all k < n can be written as requested, suppose that you get two terms 2r 3s + 2r + r' 3s + s' and show that they can be written as 2a 3b + 2a' 3b' for appropriate a, b, a' and b'.
Doesn't work. 1=2030 and 2=2030+1. How do you get from 2=2030+1=1+1 (illegal) to 2=2130 via this? This approach only works for a small number of elements k: 4 and 6, but not 2,3,4, or 7.
 
Recursion will work here, however. Just not in the simple way that CompuChip mentioned.

I don't know if this is homework, so providing an answer is not appropriate. Some hints are:
  • Recursion is a good idea, with an obvious base case of 1=2030.
  • Game over if n is divisible by 2 or 3 (why?)
That leaves the cases where n is not divisible by either 2 or by 3. I'll leave attacking these as an exercise to the OP.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top