I have read somewhere that we can extend the notion of a series of a sequence(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} a_n [/tex]

to sums over an arbitrary index set, say

[tex] a : I \to \mathbb{R} [/tex]

is a family of real number indexed by I, then

[tex] \sum_{i \in I} a_i [/tex]

is the sum of all the elements.

I think the text said that [tex]a_i \geq 0 [/tex] in order to has sense, and that if [tex]a_i \neq 0[/tex] for a non-numerable size of elements, then the series can't converge.

1) My question is with that last sentence, why cant converge such a sequence?, for example if the family is

[tex]a : \mathbb{R_{>0}} \to \mathbb{R}, a(i) = \frac{1}{i}[/tex]

how does one sum over all it's elements?

2) Other question, the fact that all the [tex]a_i \geq 0[/tex] is required because we can't asume an order on the elements of the index set, and if I have negative elements the convergence can vary according to the order in wich I made the sum?

Thanks in advance for any help in understanding this.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Sums over arbitrary index set

Loading...

Similar Threads - Sums arbitrary index | Date |
---|---|

I Integrate a function over a closed circle-like contour around an arbitrary point on a torus | Saturday at 12:51 PM |

B How can I show the sum results in this? | Mar 12, 2018 |

I Rigorously understanding chain rule for sum of functions | Aug 6, 2017 |

B Sum of increasing and decreasing functions | Mar 10, 2017 |

B Applying L'Hospital's rule to Integration as the limit of a sum | Mar 5, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**