thoughtgaze said:
No I don't think that's what they were going for. If that was the case time would have stopped traveling backward as soon as he stopped even though the whole idea is flawed.
Oh absolutely. It's not flawed, it's complete
poppycock.
There are levels of nonsense here.
First, we have to handwave "the big lie": that going faster than c will reverse time.
Now, that being granted, we have to look at how he does it. You are right, and that is what
I'm saying: that the Earth should have only reversed its rotation
while he was flying >c.
I think that they felt the effect would be lost on the audience (don't forget, they cater to non-techies, non-science-geeks, and kids). I think they felt that the "time is reversing" needed to be a discrete, identifiable event of a certian duration; the visual equivalent of beating us over the head with the message "Superman is now traveling back in time".
thoughtgaze said:
He flew in one direction to spin the Earth the other way and somehow Earth's rotation is linked with Earth's time. If ur way was true, he would be making time go backwards regardless of his direction. He's traveling faster than C both times.
Yes, I think they deliberately parted from any kind of reality in order to make their point. I think it was more important that they convey discrete events for the audience to grasp:
He flies faster than c. This
causes Earth's time to reverse. He stops. He flies fast again to
cause Earth to re-reverse."
I think the director figured it was too hard to the picture cause and effect.
"He flies faster than c. This
causes Earth's time to reverse. He stops flying fast. This
causes Earth's time stop being reversed."
I do not think they intended to convey that the Earth's physical rotation would reverse because even ignorant voewer would say "wouldn't everything on Earth be thrown through the air?"