Supersonic electric propulsion systems for airliners

In summary, the conversation discusses the idea of a supersonic vertical takeoff and landing electric jet, proposed by Elon Musk. This concept aims to reduce operating costs, emissions, and noise, as well as reduce runway needs. The conversation also mentions the possibility of using space-based solar power for aircraft propulsion, although the feasibility of this idea is uncertain. However, current battery technology may allow for short hop propeller-driven commercial flights, while hydrogen fuel cells could potentially power long-haul flights. The conversation concludes that electrically powered hypersonic jetliners are still a distant dream due to technical limitations.
  • #1
Xforce
73
6
TL;DR Summary
Electric jet liners may sound eco-friendly, however they are small, slow and weak... if power isn’t a major problem, what can we use?
Tesla+SpaceX= supersonic VTOL suborbital electric jet?
“I have an idea for a vertical takeoff and landing supersonic jet.”

Elon Musk, every time the subject of electric planes comes up, to include almost never using the VTOL abbreviation for some reason that’s probably very unimportant.

Statistics:Swapping Jet A (kerosine plane fuel) for a battery can bring a reduction of 60-80% in operating costs, 80% lower emissions and noise, and a 40% reduction in runway needs (not including VTOL), according to numbers crunched by one of the startups in the nascent electric aviation industry, Zunum Aero. Also, around 75% of all flights are domestic, and out of those, around half are under 700 miles and 20% are under 350 miles.
This is a picture of the proposed sub-orbital, supersonic electric jet, looking rather like the MHD Ayaks jet from USSR

14E07303-5054-46D0-81B0-BF577F1572D1.jpeg

How would we achieve supersonic speeds using just electric propulsion? What could the Musk jet be?
Propellers? Certainly not, just like the first generation of planes and common amongst electric planes. This method usually only achieve velocities below 300 knots (154m/s). The fastest turboprop plane was the Tu-95 I think, which the top speed was about the same speed as cruising speed of a turbofan airliner. Still, it’s impossible to reach supersonic speeds with propellers, since long before breaking the sound barrier, air around the propellers already reaches supersonic speeds (which is troublesome)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
NASA 30 years ago had a good academic research effort focused on space based solar power, sending the power back to Earth by microwaves or lasers. There was a summary of the main papers published under the rubric of 'Radiant energy conversion in space'.
One extension of this concept was for aircraft powered from space. So electric, albeit in a somewhat roundabout way. If ever the climate change pressures get too much, perhaps these ideas will get resurrected.
 
  • #3
etudiant said:
NASA 30 years ago had a good academic research effort focused on space based solar power, sending the power back to Earth by microwaves or lasers. There was a summary of the main papers published under the rubric of 'Radiant energy conversion in space'.
One extension of this concept was for aircraft powered from space. So electric, albeit in a somewhat roundabout way. If ever the climate change pressures get too much, perhaps these ideas will get resurrected.
Emm, this idea of supersonic electric jet is from Elon... and I don’t think it involves beaming power from space. Also, I’m trying to ask what kind of propulsion might it use.
 
  • #4
Xforce said:
Statistics:Swapping Jet A (kerosine plane fuel) for a battery can bring a reduction of 60-80% in operating costs, 80% lower emissions and noise, and a 40% reduction in runway needs (not including VTOL), according to numbers crunched by one of the startups in the nascent electric aviation industry, Zunum Aero...
This is a picture of the proposed sub-orbital, supersonic electric jet, looking rather like the MHD Ayaks jet from USSR
You are mixing and matching different predictions (not statistics) and examples. Please do a better job of being more rigorous and accurate in your analysis/reporting.
 
  • #5
I
russ_watters said:
You are mixing and matching different predictions (not statistics) and examples. Please do a better job of being more rigorous and accurate in your analysis/reporting.
mean according to that picture, it looks like a MHD. Not meaning that it (a Tesla/SpaceX passenger jet) is a similar thing as that Russian spy plane. And I’m skeptical about that picture as a concept. I just want to show that such concept of a supersonic (actually, hypersonic, as it goes at 4000m/s , around Mach 12) electric jet does exist before, and MHD is a really feasible way.
 
  • #6
There may be concepts, but they should be at least vaguely feasible.
Current battery technology may allow short hop propeller driven commercial flight. Long haul is still far from any practical stage, hydrogen fuel cells appear to be the most promising power source, supplying electric motor driven fans. Supersonic flight is much more demanding still, because it requires gobs of power, so much that we are not close to a new supersonic transport, fossil fueled or electric, hypersonic steps that up another notch.
So the dreams of electrically powered hypersonic jetliners will remain dreams for at least a couple of decades, too many pieces are missing to make a technically feasible design.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #7
etudiant said:
There may be concepts, but they should be at least vaguely feasible.
Current battery technology may allow short hop propeller driven commercial flight. Long haul is still far from any practical stage, hydrogen fuel cells appear to be the most promising power source, supplying electric motor driven fans. Supersonic flight is much more demanding still, because it requires gobs of power, so much that we are not close to a new supersonic transport, fossil fueled or electric, hypersonic steps that up another notch.
So the dreams of electrically powered hypersonic jetliners will remain dreams for at least a couple of decades, too many pieces are missing to make a technically feasible design.
I want to know the propulsion tech that enables supersonic/hypersonic electric propulsion. Propellers won’t do. I was considering about MHD like stuff
Also flying at high speeds and high altitudes increases the range (less time and less drag) which enables longer ranges, also maybe continuous boost-glide and sub-orbital hops will increase the range even more.
If you’re talking many decades away, probably when things like MHD is mature technology, fusion will also be ready and it enables nearly unlimited range.
This is how MHD works. although the flying craft isn’t a saucer, but if it’s supersonic and it’s VTOL, probably it is.
7AADF622-715B-494B-9A64-A1CA23914CDD.png
 
Last edited:
  • #8
MHD in propulsion is an electrically accelerated plasma flow. The concept is closest to implementation afaik
with the VASIMIR rocket thruster, which NASA is funding but which has not yet flown.
Sadly the posted picture is so absurdly simplified it is hard to relate to MHD in any way. Indeed, it seems to represent some purely electromagnetic components, with no discernible propulsion element. Nor any indication why the Laplace forces highlighted would provide such propulsion.
 
  • Informative
Likes anorlunda

FAQ: Supersonic electric propulsion systems for airliners

1. What is a supersonic electric propulsion system for airliners?

A supersonic electric propulsion system for airliners is a type of aircraft engine that uses electric energy to produce thrust and propel the aircraft at supersonic speeds.

2. How does a supersonic electric propulsion system work?

A supersonic electric propulsion system works by using electric energy to power a fan or compressor, which then compresses air and creates thrust. This thrust is used to propel the aircraft forward at supersonic speeds.

3. What are the advantages of using a supersonic electric propulsion system for airliners?

Some advantages of using a supersonic electric propulsion system for airliners include lower emissions, lower operating costs, and potentially faster flight times. It also has the potential to reduce noise pollution, making it more environmentally friendly.

4. Are there any challenges or limitations to using supersonic electric propulsion systems for airliners?

One of the main challenges of using supersonic electric propulsion systems for airliners is the current limitations in battery technology. The amount of energy needed to power an aircraft at supersonic speeds is significant, and current battery technology may not be able to meet these demands. There are also challenges in terms of weight and size, as the batteries would need to be large and heavy to provide enough energy for the aircraft.

5. Is there any ongoing research or development in the field of supersonic electric propulsion systems for airliners?

Yes, there is ongoing research and development in this field. Many companies and organizations are working on developing more efficient and powerful electric propulsion systems for aircraft. There is also research being done on alternative energy sources, such as hydrogen fuel cells, that could potentially power supersonic aircraft in the future.

Similar threads

Replies
139
Views
26K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top