Surface Area of a Sphere without Caluclus Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the surface area of a sphere without using calculus. The user initially attempts to flatten a hemisphere, mistakenly using the arc length as the radius, leading to incorrect results. The correct approach involves using the hypotenuse of the triangle formed by the radius, which accurately yields the surface area formula of 4πR². Additionally, the user questions the integration method for finding the volume of a sphere, comparing it to the surface area calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic geometry concepts, particularly spheres and hemispheres.
  • Familiarity with the formula for the surface area of a sphere, 4πR².
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically sine and its application in geometry.
  • Basic understanding of integral calculus, particularly in relation to area and volume calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the surface area formula for a sphere using calculus.
  • Explore the relationship between arc length and radius in spherical geometry.
  • Learn about the integration techniques for calculating volumes of solids of revolution.
  • Investigate the geometric implications of flattening three-dimensional shapes.
USEFUL FOR

Students of geometry, educators teaching surface area and volume concepts, and anyone interested in mathematical problem-solving without calculus.

mmmboh
Messages
401
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was just trying to find the surface area of a sphere without calculus, just for fun, but I ran into a little problem.

The way I wanted to do it was by imagining a tennis ball, and cutting it in half forming a hemisphere. Then I imagined flattening out this hemisphere would preserve the surface area, but would allow me to calculate the area as if it were a circle, and I concluded that the radius of the flattened hemisphere would be the arc length from the bottom to the top of the hemisphere, which is [tex]\pi[/tex]R/2. However then finding the area of that circle and multiplying it by two because there are two hemispheres, the area I get isn't at all 4[tex]\pi[/tex]R2. Something I noticed was that instead of using the arc length as the radius of the circle, if I find the length of the hypotenuse of the triangle connecting the bottom to the top, that gives me 21/2R, and then when I find the area of a circle with that radius, and multiply it by two, I get 4[tex]\pi[/tex]R2...can someone clear up what is going on?

2u72911.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you had actually cut the tennis ball in half and tried to flatten it, you would have noticed you can't flatten it without stretching parts of it. Stretching it changes the area. That the hypotenuse works as the correct radius I think is just an accident.
 
Ok, thanks! One more question I thought of, this time for finding volume. When finding the surface area of a sphere you can use the integral of 2[tex]\pi[/tex]Rsin[tex]\theta[/tex](Rd[tex]\theta[/tex]), where Rd[tex]\theta[/tex] is the thickness of the ring and 2[tex]\pi[/tex]Rsin[tex]\theta[/tex] is the circumference of the ring (R is the radius of the sphere), and you can integrate this from 0 to [tex]\pi[/tex]...but how come when finding the volume of the sphere you can't just integrate [tex]\pi[/tex](Rsin[tex]\theta[/tex])^2(Rd[tex]\theta[/tex])? since the thickness remains the same, but now we exchange circumference for area?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K