Surface charge density on a cylindrical cavity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the surface charge density on the inner wall of a cylindrical cavity within a conductor, where a line charge is positioned off-center. It is established that when the line charge is centered, the surface charge density remains constant, but an off-center charge results in a varying distribution around the cavity. The inner surface must still be an equipotential surface, complicating the analysis. A proposed solution involves expressing the potential as a Fourier cosine series and expanding the logarithmic term, while also addressing the placement of image charges. The conversation highlights the need to ensure that coefficients for negative terms in the series are zero, maintaining the proper conditions for the potential inside the cylinder.
rockbreaker
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi folks, I am having trouble generalizing a well-known problem. Let's say we have a cylindrical cavity inside a conductor, and in this cavity runs a line charge λ. I would now like to know the surface charge density on the inside wall of the cavity, but with the line charge not in the center of the cylindrical cavity.

It's clear that if the line charge is located in the center, the surface charge density is a constant because all points of the inner surface of the cavity are equally close to the line charge.

So when the line charge is off-center, the surface charge distribution has to be varying around the center with the angle. Yet, the inner surface of the cavity still has to be a equipotential surface.

Can anyone help me with an idea of how to solve this problem? I will for sure need the cosine law to determine the distance of the surface of the cavity from the line charge, but from there...?

Thank you very much for your help!

Regards, John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write the potential as a Fourier cosine series in a_n r^n cos\theta
plus ln[\sqrt{r^2+d^2-2rd cos\theta}].
Expand the log in a Fourier cosine series . Then set the potential = 0 at the surface r=R, setting each term in the series to zero to find the coefficients a_n.
 
That's a great idea, thank you very much. I first tried to solve this problem with image charges, but the problem is that I don't know where to place it. In the solution of Laplace's equation, all coeficients for any term r^n for n<0 must be zero, but can there survive any others than the logarithmic term?

(Two line charges a distance L/2 apart produce a potential λ/2∏ε0*ln((r^2+(L/2)^2-rLcosθ)/(r^2+(L/2)^2+rLcosθ)).)
 
Last edited:
Inside the cylinder, n must be zero or positive, with non negative and no log.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top