Surface definition in crystals question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of crystal surfaces, specifically the role of Miller indices and the concept of shift in surface orientation. Miller indices (hkl) uniquely define the orientation of a plane, but do not account for the position of the plane relative to the unit cell origin. The shift, which ranges from 0 to 1, is essential for distinguishing between parallel planes that share the same Miller indices, as it specifies the displacement of the plane. This distinction is crucial in crystallography, particularly when analyzing face-centered cubic (fcc) unit cells.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Miller indices in crystallography
  • Familiarity with crystal structures, particularly face-centered cubic (fcc) unit cells
  • Basic knowledge of unit cell concepts in solid-state physics
  • Comprehension of surface properties and their significance in materials science
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the significance of Miller indices in crystallography
  • Explore the concept of surface energy and its relation to crystal surfaces
  • Learn about the implications of surface shifts in material properties
  • Investigate techniques for characterizing crystal surfaces, such as X-ray diffraction
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in materials science, crystallographers, and anyone involved in the study of crystal surface properties and their applications in various fields.

Useful nucleus
Messages
374
Reaction score
62
I read the following paragraph about surface definition"
"Each surface is specified by at least two pieces of information.Firstly, there are the Miller indices (hkl) of the plane that defines the orientation of the bulk cleavage. Secondly, there is the so-called shift - i.e. the displacement of the plane relative to the unit cell origin. The shift ranges between 0 and 1."

I do not quite understand what the shift means. To me it looks a surface with a shift x (say x >0 ) is equivalent to another surface with different miller indices and shift zero. Am I right here?

In other words , to me it looks unnecessary to use the shift since miller indices are enough to uniqule specify the surface.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Miller indices only define the plane orientation. 2 parallel planes have the same Miller indices.

Take a fcc unit cell for example. If you cleave along the (001) plane, you could cut between the first/second or second/third layer. If you just used the Miller indices, there would be no way to distinguish between the 2 surfaces.
 
WHoops, I forgot that the Miller indices by definition have to be relatively prime! Thank you for clarification, it reminded me of the definition :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K