Surface Integral involving Paraboloid

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 6K views
LunaFly
Messages
35
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Evaluate the surface integral:

∫∫s y dS

S is the part of the paraboloid y= x2 + z2 that lies inside the cylinder x2 + z2 =4.

Homework Equations



∫∫sf(x,y,z)dS = ∫∫Df(r(u,v))*|ru x rv|dA

The Attempt at a Solution



I've drawn the region D in the xz-plane as a circle with radius 2. My limits of integration are r between 0 and 2, and t between 0 and 2∏.

I've parametrized the surface as:
r(r,t)= <rcos(t), r2, rsin(t)>

I've gotten the vectors:
rr=<cos(t), 2r, sin(t)>
rt=<-rsin(t), 0, rcos(t)>

Trying to find dS, I did:
rr X rt = <2r2cos(t), -r, 2r2sin(t)>,
and the magnitude of that is r√(4r2 +1).

Overall, I end up with dS = r2*√(4r2+1)drdt.

The integral becomes:

∫∫r4*√(4r2+1)drdt, with limits as mentioned above.

However this is not the correct answer. I am having a difficult time with these surface integrals and I am not really sure why. I keep getting confused about whether or not I am parametrizing
the surfaces correctly, so that may be where my error is. Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks
-Luna
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
LunaFly said:

Homework Statement



Evaluate the surface integral:

∫∫s y dS

S is the part of the paraboloid y= x2 + z2 that lies inside the cylinder x2 + z2 =4.


Homework Equations



∫∫sf(x,y,z)dS = ∫∫Df(r(u,v))*|ru x rv|dA


The Attempt at a Solution



I've drawn the region D in the xz-plane as a circle with radius 2. My limits of integration are r between 0 and 2, and t between 0 and 2∏.

I've parametrized the surface as:
r(r,t)= <rcos(t), r2, rsin(t)>

I've gotten the vectors:
rr=<cos(t), 2r, sin(t)>
rt=<-rsin(t), 0, rcos(t)>

Trying to find dS, I did:
rr X rt = <2r2cos(t), -r, 2r2sin(t)>,
and the magnitude of that is r√(4r2 +1).

Overall, I end up with dS = r2*√(4r2+1)drdt.
Yes, this is what I get.

The integral becomes:

∫∫r4*√(4r2+1)drdt, with limits as mentioned above.
What? [itex]\int\int y dS= \int \int (r^2)dS= \int \int (r^2)(r\sqrt{4r^2+ 1})drd\theta[/itex]
You should have [itex]r^3[/itex] outside the square root, not [itex]r^4[/itex].

However this is not the correct answer. I am having a difficult time with these surface integrals and I am not really sure why. I keep getting confused about whether or not I am parametrizing
the surfaces correctly, so that may be where my error is. Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks
-Luna
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, this is what I get.


What? [itex]\int\int y dS= \int \int (r^2)dS= \int \int (r^2)(r\sqrt{4r^2+ 1})drd\theta[/itex]
You should have [itex]r^3[/itex] outside the square root, not [itex]r^4[/itex].

I believe it is r4 because:

My paramatrization has y=r2, so f(r(r,t))=r2

dS = |rr X rt|dA = r√(4r2 + 1) * rdrdt

dA = r drdt (because of the relationship between polar and Cartesian coordinates) which is where the r4 comes from.

Altogether, ∫∫sf(r(r,t))dS = ∫∫Dr2*r√(4r2 + 1) * rdrdt= ∫∫Dr4√(4r2+1) drdt

This may be helpful: According to the book, the integral equals (∏/60)(391√(17) +1).
 
Last edited:
So I tried solving the integral that HallsofIvy thought was correct, and it was! Thanks for the response.

But that brings a new question to light: why does dA become drdt rather than r*drdt?

I had the impression that every time we switched from Cartesian to polar, dA became r*drdt, but it seems that in this problem, that's not the case.

Why?
 
LunaFly said:
So I tried solving the integral that HallsofIvy thought was correct, and it was! Thanks for the response.

But that brings a new question to light: why does dA become drdt rather than r*drdt?

I had the impression that every time we switched from Cartesian to polar, dA became r*drdt, but it seems that in this problem, that's not the case.

Why?

The formula for surface area element for a surface parameterized as ##\vec R = \vec R(u,v)## is ##dS = |\vec R_u \times \vec R_v|dudv##. There is no extra ##u## or ##v##, and in your case, no extra ##r##.

Suppose your surface had been a circle in the xy plane. You might parameterize it as ##\vec R(r,\theta) = \langle r\cos\theta,r\sin\theta,0\rangle##. If you calculate ##dS = |\vec R_r\times \vec R_\theta|drd\theta## you will find that that cross product is where the familiar ##r## in ##rdrd\theta## comes from. You don't add an extra ##r## when you parameterize it from the beginning.