Surface Integral of a sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of a surface integral over a sphere using spherical coordinates. The original poster presents an integral involving the distance between two vectors and expresses confusion regarding the final result and the treatment of certain vector quantities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the transition from the integral expression to the final results for different ranges of r. Some participants question the clarity of the problem statement and the notation used for vector quantities. Others suggest that the treatment of area elements and the dependence of vectors on angles may need reconsideration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's confusion, offering guidance on notation and the setup of the integral. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions made in the problem, particularly regarding vector notation and the treatment of area elements.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that the original problem statement may not have been fully conveyed, leading to some misunderstandings. Participants are also addressing the implications of treating certain quantities as vectors versus scalars.

TheGreatDeadOne
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Let a sphere of radius ##r_0## be centered at the origin, and ##\vec{r'}## the position vector of a point p' within the sphere or under its surface S. Let the position vector ##\vec{r}## be an arbitrary fixed point P. With this information, solve the integral, and analyze the cases for ##r\geq r_0## and ##r\leq r_0##
Relevant Equations
$$I=\oint_{s} \frac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|}da'$$
Solving the integral is the easiest part. Using spherical coordinates:

$$ \oint_{s} \frac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|}da' = \int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|}r_{0}^2 \hat r \sin{\theta}d\theta d\phi$$

then:

$$I = \dfrac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|}r_{0}^2(1+1)(2\pi)\hat r=\dfrac{4\pi r_{0}^2}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|}\hat r $$

But what I couldn't understand was the final answer which is:

##\frac{4\pi r^{2}_{0}}{r} \quad\text{for} \quad r\geq r_0 \quad and \quad 4\pi r^{2}_{0}\quad for \quad r\leq r_0 ##

What happened to ##\frac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|} \hat r## for both ## r\geq r_0## and ## r\leq r_0 ## ? I know that for r -> 0 the integral explodes -Dirac enters here? -, but I don't know how this can help to reach the final result and I was very confused by the analysis for ## r\geq r_0## and ## r\leq r_0 ## part.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are making mistakes based on not using proper vector notation for vectors. Please indicate vector quantities using \vec as so \vec r = ##\vec r##.
 
Also, please give the full problem statement verbatim. Your statement does not actually ask a question so it is unclear wether the integral you present is something given by the problem or something you have arrived at.
 
Yes, they are vectors, I thought it was implicit in the question. But I still don't understand your point in saying "mistakes".

That integral at the beginning is given in the problem.
 
TheGreatDeadOne said:
Yes, they are vectors, I thought it was implicit in the question. But I still don't understand your point in saying "mistakes".
Please fix the vector notation first. Without it it is impossible to tell exactly which mistakes you are making. No, it is not always implicit and you are sometimes treating what should be a vector quantity as if it was a vector norm. It is therefore difficult to tell if it is a problem of setup or of computation.

Also see #3
 
Ok, edited. The vectors within the module would be the separation vector ## R = |\vec{r} - \vec{r'}|##.
 
Ok so here are some points:

You are treating ##da’## as a directed area. It is a scalar area so you need to get rid of the ##\hat r##

You cannot integrate like that. ##\vec r’## depends on the angles (so does ##\hat r##, but it should not be there in the first place).
 
Orodruin said:
Ok so here are some points:

You are treating ##da’## as a directed area. It is a scalar area so you need to get rid of the ##\hat r##

You cannot integrate like that. ##\vec r’## depends on the angles (so does ##\hat r##, but it should not be there in the first place).
Ohhhhh I focused a lot on the radial (fixed) part that I forgot about the azimuthal and polar dependence.

edit: misspelling
 
Last edited:
I'll try to solve it tomorrow and post it here. Corrected some spelling errors (typed on cell phone)
 
  • #10
TheGreatDeadOne said:
I'll try to solve it tomorrow and post it here. Corrected some spelling errors (typed on cell phone)
Good luck! Choose the z-axis of your spherical coordinates wisely!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheGreatDeadOne

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K