Surface integral of vector field

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the surface integral ∫E·dS for a vector field E over a conical surface defined by specific bounds. Participants clarify the interpretation of the angles and coordinate systems, debating whether to use spherical coordinates or Cartesian coordinates for the calculations. There is confusion regarding the correct expression for the normal vector to the surface and the resulting dot product with the vector field. Ultimately, it is suggested to maintain consistency in the coordinate system to simplify the calculations. The correct answer to the integral is noted as (7B π)/2, indicating a potential error in the initial approach.
sandylam966
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find ∫E.dS, where E = (Ar^2, Br (sinθ),C cosρ), over the outside conical surface S, given by 1≤r≤2, θ=\pi/3 (this is an open surface, excluding the end faces).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



from the context I believe ρ is the plane polar angle on the x-y plane, so the surface is a slanted ring with width 1 around the z axis.
expressing S in vector v = ((√3 r cosρ)/2, (√3 r sinρ)/2, r/2), so ∫E.dS = ∫^{2pi}_{0}∫^{2}_{1} (Ar^2, (√3 Br)/2 ,C cosρ).((-√3 r cosρ)/4, (-√3 r sinρ)/4, 3r/4) drdρ, where I have taken the normal to the surface from outside to inside of the conical. Then, after the dot product each term in the integrand has a sine or cosine term, hence integrating ρ from 0 to 2pi will give zero.

the given answer is (7B pi)/2. where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From the problem statement I would rather say (r, ##\theta##, ##\rho##) are spherical coordinates.
 
bloby said:
From the problem statement I would rather say (r, ##\theta##, ##\rho##) are spherical coordinates.

yes that's what I've used. using let θ=pi/3 I parameterise the surface in terms of ρ and r. did I make any mistake here?
 
The domain is right: 1<r<2 and 0<##\rho##<2 pi, but the vectors are expressed in the basis ##\{e_{r},e_{\theta},e_{\rho}\}##.
The unit normal outside the surface is then very simple.
Can you find dS in this basis?
 
Last edited:
bloby said:
Yes, the vectors are expressed in the basis ##\{e_{r},e_{\theta},e_{\rho}\}##.
The normal outside the surface is then very simple.

hmm I don't think I get it. partial differentiating v wrt r and ρ, then take the cross product of the 2, I got ((-√3 r cosρ)/4, (-√3 r sinρ)/4, 3r/4) , pointing into the ring. is this not the correct normal?
 
Ok, yes it is possible but way too complicate here. (E is expressed in the basis I mentioned above. You are expressing things in ##\{e_x,e_y,e_z\}## here so to take the dot product you would have to express E in ##\{e_x,e_y,e_z\}##)
Keep things in shperical coordinates, it is much simpler here.
Remember
##e_{r}##: unite vector in the direction of growing r
##e_{\theta}##: unite vector in the direction of growing ##\theta##
##e_{\rho}##: unite vector in the direction of growing ##\rho##
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K