Surface integral of vector field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a surface integral of a vector field, specifically ∫E.dS, where E is defined in terms of variables related to a conical surface. The problem involves understanding the geometry of the surface and the appropriate coordinate system for integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the coordinates involved, with some suggesting that the variables may represent spherical coordinates. Others question the parameterization of the surface and the expression of the normal vector.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct coordinate system and the implications for the surface integral. Some participants have provided insights into the normal vector and the basis used for expressing the vectors, while others are seeking clarification on the parameterization and integration process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, including the specified ranges for r and ρ, and the need to maintain consistency in the coordinate system used throughout the discussion.

sandylam966
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find ∫E.dS, where E = (Ar^2, Br (sinθ),C cosρ), over the outside conical surface S, given by 1≤r≤2, θ=\pi/3 (this is an open surface, excluding the end faces).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



from the context I believe ρ is the plane polar angle on the x-y plane, so the surface is a slanted ring with width 1 around the z axis.
expressing S in vector v = ((√3 r cosρ)/2, (√3 r sinρ)/2, r/2), so ∫E.dS = ∫^{2pi}_{0}∫^{2}_{1} (Ar^2, (√3 Br)/2 ,C cosρ).((-√3 r cosρ)/4, (-√3 r sinρ)/4, 3r/4) drdρ, where I have taken the normal to the surface from outside to inside of the conical. Then, after the dot product each term in the integrand has a sine or cosine term, hence integrating ρ from 0 to 2pi will give zero.

the given answer is (7B pi)/2. where did I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From the problem statement I would rather say (r, ##\theta##, ##\rho##) are spherical coordinates.
 
bloby said:
From the problem statement I would rather say (r, ##\theta##, ##\rho##) are spherical coordinates.

yes that's what I've used. using let θ=pi/3 I parameterise the surface in terms of ρ and r. did I make any mistake here?
 
The domain is right: 1<r<2 and 0<##\rho##<2 pi, but the vectors are expressed in the basis ##\{e_{r},e_{\theta},e_{\rho}\}##.
The unit normal outside the surface is then very simple.
Can you find dS in this basis?
 
Last edited:
bloby said:
Yes, the vectors are expressed in the basis ##\{e_{r},e_{\theta},e_{\rho}\}##.
The normal outside the surface is then very simple.

hmm I don't think I get it. partial differentiating v wrt r and ρ, then take the cross product of the 2, I got ((-√3 r cosρ)/4, (-√3 r sinρ)/4, 3r/4) , pointing into the ring. is this not the correct normal?
 
Ok, yes it is possible but way too complicate here. (E is expressed in the basis I mentioned above. You are expressing things in ##\{e_x,e_y,e_z\}## here so to take the dot product you would have to express E in ##\{e_x,e_y,e_z\}##)
Keep things in shperical coordinates, it is much simpler here.
Remember
##e_{r}##: unite vector in the direction of growing r
##e_{\theta}##: unite vector in the direction of growing ##\theta##
##e_{\rho}##: unite vector in the direction of growing ##\rho##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K