Surface Integral With Divergence Thm

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating a surface integral using the Divergence Theorem, specifically for the vector field ##\mathit{F}(x,y,z) = (e^y\cos z, \sqrt{x^3 + 1}\sin z, x^2 + y^2 + 3)## over a surface defined by the graph of ##z = (1-x^2-y^2)e^{(1-x^2-3y^2)}## for ##z \ge 0##.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the Divergence Theorem and the necessity of closing the surface to apply it. Questions arise about the meaning of "closing up" a surface and how to handle the additional surface added.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested adding the surface at ##z=0## to create a closed surface and have discussed the resulting surface integral. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct orientation for the normal vector on the added surface.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the divergence of the vector field being zero and how that affects the evaluation of the surface integral. There is a focus on ensuring the normal vector is outward pointing for the added surface.

Karnage1993
Messages
131
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let ##\mathit{F}(x,y,z) = (e^y\cos z, \sqrt{x^3 + 1}\sin z, x^2 + y^2 + 3)## and let ##S## be the graph of ##z = (1-x^2-y^2)e^{(1-x^2-3y^2)}## for ##z \ge 0##, oriented by the upward unit normal. Evaluate ##\int_{S} \mathit{F} \ dS##. (Hint: Close up this surface and use the Divergence Theorem)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


It's clear that ##div \ F = 0##, so if I was working with a closed surface, ##\int_{S} \mathit{F} \ dS## would equal 0. For the graph of ##S##, I am unsure as to what "closing up" a surface means. How would one close up a surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Add the surface z=0 to creates closed surface. Then, the divergence theorem gives the surface integral of the sum of the surfaces; subtract the integral over what you added to get the surface integral of the desired surface.
 
Ok, so what I think you're saying is I have to do:

##0 - \int_{plane \ z = 0} F \ dS##

which will get me only the surface integral of the graph of z?
 
Karnage1993 said:
Ok, so what I think you're saying is I have to do:

##0 - \int_{plane \ z = 0} F \ dS##

which will get me only the surface integral of the graph of z?

Yes. And you'll need to pick the correct direction for the normal vector for the surface z=0.
 
For it to be outward pointing, would the z-component have to be negative, ie, (0,0,-1)?
 
Karnage1993 said:
For it to be outward pointing, would the z-component have to be negative, ie, (0,0,-1)?

Exactly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K