SURFACE INTEGRALS appying to z=f(x,y) x=f(y,z) and y=f(x,z)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of surface integrals in the context of different variable representations, specifically z=f(x,y), y=f(x,z), and x=f(y,z). Participants explore the implications of these representations in terms of coordinate systems and the conditions under which they can be interchanged.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why surface integrals defined as z=f(x,y) can also apply to y=f(x,z) and x=f(y,z), suggesting that the symmetry of the variables might allow for such interchange.
  • Others argue that the choice of labeling axes as x, y, and z is arbitrary, and that these labels are a matter of convention rather than inherent properties of the equations.
  • A participant notes that it may not always be feasible to express z=f(x,y) in terms of y=f(x,z) or x=f(y,z), referencing the implicit function theorem as a limiting factor.
  • Another participant explains that surfaces can generally be represented using two parameters, and discusses the conditions under which different variable representations can be used, including examples involving spherical coordinates.
  • Technical details are provided regarding the calculation of the differential of surface area using derivatives and cross products, illustrating how to derive the surface area from the parameterization of the surface.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interchangeability of variable representations in surface integrals, with some supporting the idea based on symmetry, while others highlight limitations imposed by mathematical properties. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to conceptualizing these relationships.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific mathematical conditions for the interchangeability of variable representations and the implications of the implicit function theorem, which are not fully explored in the discussion.

PhysicsHelp12
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
You know when a definition is given in terms of z=f(x,y) like the surface integral

and its assmed to apply to y=f(x,z)and x=f(y,z) too ...

Why is this?

I know theyre just variables ...but since x y and z mean something specifically wrt the

coordinate system


Would it be trivial to say By Symmetry, x=f(y,z) and y=f(x,z) applies too ?

which way is better to think about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would it matter? Labeling the axis x, y and z is your own choice, you can label them in any manner you want. Yes there is a convention but the labels we give are our own choice and the reason we choose a particular convention is so others would have an idea when they try to do the problem.
 
Note that it may not always be possible to express an equation z=f(x,y) as x=f(y,z) or y=f(x,z). That has something to do with the implicit function thereom.
 
In general a surface, being a two dimensional geometric object, can be written in terms of 2 parameters: [itex]\vec{r}= f(u,v)\vec{i}+ g(u,v)\vec{j}+ h(u,v)\vec{k}[/itex]
or simply [itex]x= f(u,v)[/itex], [itex]y= g(u,v)[/itex], [itex]z= h(u,v)[/itex].

IF the surface is given as z= h(x,y), then you can use x and y themselves as "u" and "v": x= f(x,y)= x, y= g(x,y)= y, z= h(x,y).

IF it is possible to solve for y, say y= g(x, z), then you can use x and z as "u" and "v": x= f(x,z)= x, y= g(x,z), z= h(x,z)= z.

IF it is possible to solve for x, say x= f(y,z), then you can use y and z as "u" and "v":
x= f(x,z), y= g(y,z)= y, z= h(y,z)= z.

But it is quite possible that NONE of those can be used. For example, with the surface of the unit sphere, none of x, y, or z can be written as a function of the other two. What you can do is use spherical coordinates with [itex]\rho[/itex] set to 1:
[itex]x= cos(\theta)sin(\phi)[/itex], [itex]y= sin(\theta)sin(\phi)[/itex], [itex]z= cos(\phi)[/itex].

A good way to find the "differential of surface area" when given x= f(u,v), y= g(u,v), z= h(u,v) or, equivalently, [itex]\vec{r}= f(u,v)\vec{i}+ g(u,v)\vec{j}+ h(u,v)\vec{k}[/itex] is to take the derivatives: [itex]\vec{r}_u= f_u\vec{i}+ g_u\vec{j}+ h_u\vec{k}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{r}_v= f_v\vec{i}+ g_v\vec{j}+ h_v\vec{k}[/itex] and then take their cross product. The differential of surface area is [itex]dS= ||\vec{r}_u\times\vec{r}_v|| dudv[/itex].

Even simpler is the "vector differential of surface area" (calculating the flux of a vector field through a surface, say): [itex]d\vec{S}= \vec{r}_u\times\vec{r}_v dudv[/itex]

For example, if you are given z= f(x,y) then [itex]\vec{r}= x\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ f(x,y)\vec{k}[/itex] so [itex]\vec{r}_x= \vec{i}+ f_x\vec{j}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{r}_y= \vec{j}+ f_y\vec{k}[/itex] so the cross product is [itex]f_x\vec{i}+ f_y\vec{j}+ \vec{k}[/itex] (or its negative, depending on orientation) and the length of that is
[itex]\sqrt{f_x^2+ f_y^2+ 1}[/itex] so the differential of surface area is just the "usual" formula [itex]\sqrt{f_x^2+ f_y^2+ 1}dx dy[/itex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K