Surface integrals (without real integration)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a surface integral involving a vector field F defined as (ix + jy) Ln(x^2 + y^2) over a cylindrical surface S with radius r and height h. Participants are exploring the implications of the surface integral and its physical meaning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to calculate the surface integral by considering the area of the cylindrical surface and the logarithmic function. There is confusion regarding the contribution of the cylinder's caps and the physical interpretation of the surface integral itself. Some suggest switching to polar coordinates for clarity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing uncertainty about their understanding of surface integrals and the specific problem at hand. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of polar coordinates, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach or interpretation yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the physical meaning of surface integrals and the implications of their calculations, indicating a potential gap in foundational understanding. There is also mention of confusion regarding the contributions of different parts of the cylindrical surface.

mewmew
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Given F= [tex](ix+jy) Ln(x^2+y^2)[/tex]

and given S, which is a cylinder of radius r, and height h(in the z axis) evaluate [tex]\int\int_s F.n \,ds[/tex]. It says that you shouldn't need to do any work if you think about it enough. I figured I could find the area of the main part to be [tex]2 \pi r h[/tex] then multiply that by [tex]Ln(r^2)=2Ln(r)[/tex] to get the answer but I am off by a factor of r in my answer. I don't think the caps to the cylinder contribute to this as the normal is orthogonal to F.

One more question, what exactly does a surface integral return? I feel stupid but I can't seem to find out exactly what the physical meaning of the result of a surface integral is. Thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mewmew said:
Given F= [tex](ix+jy) Ln(x^2+y^2)[/tex]

and given S, which is a cylinder of radius r, and height h(in the z axis) evaluate [tex]\int\int_s F.n \,ds[/tex]. It says that you shouldn't need to do any work if you think about it enough. I figured I could find the area of the main part to be [tex]2 \pi r h[/tex] then multiply that by [tex]Ln(r^2)=2Ln(r)[/tex] to get the answer but I am off by a factor of r in my answer. I don't think the caps to the cylinder contribute to this as the normal is orthogonal to F.

One more question, what exactly does a surface integral return? I feel stupid but I can't seem to find out exactly what the physical meaning of the result of a surface integral is. Thanks for the help.

A surface integral is the integral of a function over a surface, as opposed to a line, etc. Unit-wise you are gaining an extra meter^2. As far as a physical meaning, it depends on what you are integrating.

What's happening in this integration would be easier to understand if you switch everything to polar coordinates.

-Dan
 
I think I'm just confusing myself more :rolleyes: If I integrate that vector function around a cylinder than it will be 0. I can imagine that we would have constant vectors of magnitude [tex]Ln[r^2][/tex] all in the radial direction around the cylinder for any z value. I guess I still don't have a good enough understanding of what a surface integral really is to be able to find an easy way to express this. I think its time to re-read some div,grad,curl.
 
Last edited:
As topsquark said, switch over to polar.

In fact, I suggest you work this out the hard way and then look back.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K