MHB Surface of Revolution: Find Equation & Identify Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Revolution Surface
AI Thread Summary
The equation of the surface of revolution formed by revolving the curve defined by y^2 + z^2 + 2y = 0 around the y-axis is identified as a sphere. This curve can be rewritten as (y + 1)^2 + z^2 = 1, representing a circle centered at (0, -1, 0) with a radius of 1. When this circle is revolved about the y-axis, it generates a sphere. The resulting equation for the sphere is x^2 + (y + 1)^2 + z^2 = 1. Thus, the discussion effectively identifies the surface of revolution as a sphere.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote a question from Yahoo! Answers

Find the equation of the surface of revolution when y^2+z^2+2y=0 is revolved about y-axis. Identify the surface of revolution.

I have given a link to the topic there so the OP can see my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We can express $y^2+z^2+2y=0 $ as $(y+1)^2+z^2=1$, so $\gamma\equiv y^2+z^2+2y=0,x=0$ is a circle with center $(0,-1,0)$, radius $1$, and revolving about one of its diameters. As a consquence, the corresponding surface is the sphere $E\equiv x^2+(y+1)^2+z^2=1$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top