Observing Change in Surface Tension with Wire Immersion

AI Thread Summary
The experiment involved immersing a normal temperature wire in water with floating particles like lycopodium and glitter. The observer noted that the particles dispersed radially, which seemed unusual and not solely due to the plunging motion of the wire. There is speculation that the immersion of the wire may alter surface tension or the attraction forces between the particles and water molecules. The discussion highlights the sensitivity of water's interfacial energy to contamination, suggesting that residue on the wire could explain the observed effects. Understanding these interactions could provide insights into the physical changes occurring during the experiment.
jangheej
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
hi =D
i observed something interesting during the experiment.
i immersed a normal temperature wire in a chalet filled with water and particles (lycopodium, glitter) floating on the surface.
the original problem is to immerse a "hot" wire (2011 IYPT problem) but i was curious
what would happen if a normal wire was plunged.

Interestingly, the particles dispersed radially to an extent that doesn't seem to occur
simply due to the plunging motion.
So I am wondering if surface tension or any attraction force between particles and water molecules would change due to the immersion of wire.
What physical change is related to this? Any idea? =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The interfacial energy of water is incredibly sensitive to contamination. Crud on the wire could be sufficient to account for your observations.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top