What is the General Form of Solutions for the Schrodinger Wave Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pzona
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form General
pzona
Messages
234
Reaction score
0
I'm learning how to solve the Schrodinger wave equation and I know that the solutions are of the general form:

\Psi(x) = A sin kx + B cos kx

This was given to us, but where did it come from? Is it the fact that the wave could be a sine or cosine wave, and the other constant multiplier (A or B) can then be set to zero using boundary conditions? Or is there something more complicated going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi.
ψ (x) = A sin kx + B cos kx
is derived from
ψ" (x) = -k^2 ψ (x)
which is derived from
(-i hbar ∂/∂x)^2/2m ψ (x) = hbar^2 k^2/2m ψ (x)
which is stationary SWE in the system of no potential energy with energy eigenvalue hbar^2 k^2/2m.
A and B are chosen to meet the boundary conditions.
Regards.
 
Ooooookay, that makes sense. I wasn't sure where (or even if) -k^2 came into play here, but now that you showed me, I should have seen it. I didn't even think of reducing h, but that makes a lot more sense. Thanks a lot for the response.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top