Sylow Theory Problem: Proving N[N[P]] = N[P] for a Finite Group G and Prime p

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for a finite group G and a prime p dividing |G|, the equation N[N[P]] = N[P] holds true, where P is a Sylow p-subgroup of G. The proof utilizes the Second Sylow Theorem, establishing that any two Sylow p-subgroups are conjugate. It defines the normalizer N[P] as the largest subgroup of G in which P is normal, leading to the conclusion that P is the only Sylow p-subgroup in N[P]. The argument demonstrates that elements of N[N[P]] must also belong to N[P], confirming the equality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Sylow Theorems in group theory
  • Familiarity with normalizers in group theory
  • Knowledge of finite groups and their properties
  • Basic concepts of group conjugacy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Second Sylow Theorem in detail
  • Explore examples of Sylow p-subgroups in finite groups
  • Learn about the structure and properties of normalizers in group theory
  • Investigate the implications of conjugacy in finite groups
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying group theory, as well as educators and researchers interested in advanced algebraic structures and their properties.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] sylow theory problem

Homework Statement


Let G be a finite group and let p be a prime dividing |G|. Let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of G. Show that N[N[P]]=N[P].

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Please confirm that this proof is correct.

The Second Sylow Theorem tells us that any two Sylow p-subgroups of a finite group must be conjugate.
The normalizer of P is the subgroup N[P]={g \in G : gPg^{-1} = P}. It is obvious that N[P] is the largest subgroup of G in which P is normal.
It follows immediately that P is the only Sylow p-subgroup in N[P].
The normalizer of the normalizer of P is the subgroup N[N[P]] = {g \in G : gN[P]g^{-1} = N[P]}. I claim that P is normal in N[N[P]]. If g in N[N[P]], then gPg^{-1} \subset N[P] and since P is the only Sylow p-subgroup in N[P], it follows immediately that gPg^{-1} = P. Thus g is contained in N[P] and N[N[P]] is contained in N[P].

Why did they tell us that p is a prime that divides |G|? Doesn't that follow from the fact that there exists a Sylow-p-subgroup?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks kosher.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K