Sylow Theory Problem: Proving N[N[P]] = N[P] for a Finite Group G and Prime p

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 5K views
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] sylow theory problem

Homework Statement


Let G be a finite group and let p be a prime dividing |G|. Let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of G. Show that N[N[P]]=N[P].

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Please confirm that this proof is correct.

The Second Sylow Theorem tells us that any two Sylow p-subgroups of a finite group must be conjugate.
The normalizer of P is the subgroup N[P]={[itex]g \in G[/itex] : [itex]gPg^{-1} = P[/itex]}. It is obvious that N[P] is the largest subgroup of G in which P is normal.
It follows immediately that P is the only Sylow p-subgroup in N[P].
The normalizer of the normalizer of P is the subgroup N[N[P]] = {[itex]g \in G[/itex] : [itex]gN[P]g^{-1} = N[P][/itex]}. I claim that P is normal in N[N[P]]. If g in N[N[P]], then [itex]gPg^{-1} \subset N[P][/itex] and since P is the only Sylow p-subgroup in N[P], it follows immediately that gPg^{-1} = P. Thus g is contained in N[P] and N[N[P]] is contained in N[P].

Why did they tell us that p is a prime that divides |G|? Doesn't that follow from the fact that there exists a Sylow-p-subgroup?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org