What Are the Key Symmetries and Degeneracies in Lattice Structures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetries
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi all

What symmetries are there usually in a lattice? Let us say for example that I look at a lattice having the form (each "x" is an atom)

x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x x


Of course there is translational symmetry (assuming homogeneous system). But what other symmetries are usually responsible for degeneracies?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If this is a 2D square lattice, you have inversion, three reflection symmetries, and a four fold rotation symmetry. Say if each atom has p orbitals on it, then px and py will be equivalent, because you have at least one symmetry operation that maps px onto py. In this case it's the 4 fold rotation, or the reflection through the [110] axis. This will make px and py degenerate.
 
The three reflections are longitudinal, horizontal and diagonal, right?
The four rotations are longitudinal, horizontal, diagonal and what is the fourth?

I can't see what you mean by inversion - isn't that included in the reflections?
 
A 4 fold rotation axis means you have an axis where you can rotate the system in steps of 360/4 degrees. Translational symmetry is compatible only with 2, 3, 4, and 6 fold rotation axes.

You are correct about the three reflection planes. And inversion in this case is the composite of the horizontal and vertical reflections. But they are distinct symmetry operations, and not every crystal which has inversion will have the other reflections.
 
kanato said:
You are correct about the three reflection planes.

By the way, aren't there four? Two diagonals, one vertical and one horizontal.
 
Yes, that's right, there should be four.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top