I Symmetries in quantum mechanics and the change of operators

Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
When we make a symmetrie transformation in a quantum system, the state ##|\psi \rangle## change to ## |\psi' \rangle = U|\psi \rangle##, where ##U## is a unitary or antiunitary operator, and the operator ##A## change to ##A'##. If we require that the expections values of operators don't change, we have $$\langle \psi '| A' | \psi ' \rangle= \langle \psi | U^{\dagger}A'U | \psi \rangle =\langle \psi | A | \psi \rangle,$$ what suggest that ##A' = UAU^{\dagger}##. However, in some textbooks, like Sakurai, the change in the operator is ##A' = U^{\dagger}AU##. Why this difference appear? They are equivalent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check to make sure of the definition of ##U##. Are they saying ##|\psi'\rangle = U |\psi\rangle## or ##|\psi\rangle = U |\psi'\rangle##?

In the first case, ##A' = U A U^\dagger##, in the second case, ##A' = U^\dagger A U##
 
Thanks for answering. I think it's the first case. In section 4.3, Sakurai talk about discrete symmetries. The first example is the lattice translation; he considerer a periodic potential ##V## and define the translation operator ##\tau## such that ##\tau (l) |x \rangle = |x + l \rangle ## (##| x \rangle## is a eigenstate of the position operator). So he write $$\tau ^{\dagger}(a) V(x) \tau (a) = V(x + a).$$ But shouldn't it be: ##\tau(a) V(x) \tau ^{\dagger}(a) = V(x + a)##?
 
I think it's confusing to mix up the operator ##\hat{V}## with its value ##V(x)##, which is just a number. So here's the way I would say it:

##\hat{V}## is an operator which acts on position eigenstates as follows:

##\hat{V} |x\rangle = V(x) |x\rangle##

The ##V(x)## on the right side of the equals is just a number, not an operator, so acting on it with ##\tau(a)## or ##\tau^\dagger(a)## would do nothing. Similarly,

##\hat{V} |x+a\rangle = V(x+a) |x+a\rangle##

which is equivalent to:

##\hat{V} \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x+a) \tau(a) |x\rangle##

Now, act on both sides with ##\tau^\dagger(a)##:

##\tau^\dagger(a) \hat{V} \tau(a) |x\rangle = \tau^\dagger(a) V(x+a) \tau(a) |x\rangle##

But remember, on the right-hand side, ##V(x+a)## is just a number, not an operator. So ##\tau^\dagger(a)## commutes with it, to give:

##\tau^\dagger(a) V(x+a) \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x+a) \tau^\dagger(a) \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x) |x\rangle## (since ##\tau^\dagger(a) = (\tau(a))^{-1}##).

So we have:
##\tau^\dagger(a) \hat{V} \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x+a) |x\rangle##

So ##\tau^\dagger(a) \hat{V} \tau(a)## is the operator which acts on ##|x\rangle## and returns ##V(x+a) |x\rangle##
 
  • Like
Likes Avodyne and Lebnm
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top