Insights Symmetry Arguments and the Infinite Wire with a Current

AI Thread Summary
Symmetry arguments are crucial for understanding the magnetic field around an infinite wire carrying a constant current. The discussion emphasizes that the magnetic field cannot have components in the radial direction or along the wire itself due to these symmetry considerations. It also highlights the importance of transformation properties of vectors, particularly how the magnetic field vector behaves under spatial transformations like rotations and reflections. This analysis is essential for applying Gauss's law analogously to magnetic fields. Overall, the exploration deepens the understanding of magnetic fields in relation to symmetry in physics.
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
22,807
Reaction score
14,861
Many people reading this will be familiar with symmetry arguments related to the use of Gauss law. Finding the electric field around a spherically symmetric charge distribution or around an infinite wire carrying a charge per unit length are standard examples. This Insight explores similar arguments for the magnetic field around an infinite wire carrying a constant current ##I##, which may not be as familiar. In particular, our focus is on the arguments that can be used to conclude that the magnetic field cannot have a component in the radial direction or in the direction of the wire itself.
Transformation properties of vectors
To use symmetry arguments we first need to establish how the magnetic field transforms under different spatial transformations. How it transforms under rotations and reflections will be of particular interest. The magnetic field is described by a vector ##\vec B## with both...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reply
  • Like
Likes iamanegg, vanhees71, scottdave and 6 others

Thread 'Maxwell stress tensor'

This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
View full post »
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'

Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'

Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
View full post »

Similar threads

I E-field around charged finite wire - intractable or not?
Replies
10
Views
948
I The vector math of relative motion of wire-loop & bar magnet
Replies
1
Views
2K
Insights A Physics Misconception with Gauss’ Law
Replies
5
Views
3K
I Does a Railgun's Current Violate Conservation of Momentum?
2
Replies
61
Views
5K
I Charge movement relative to magnetic field frame dependence/invariance
Replies
5
Views
899
I Resulting magnetic field due to the passage of an AC current
Replies
27
Views
2K
I The implications of symmetry + uniqueness in electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux
Replies
5
Views
138
I How to use geometrical symmetries -- general advice? (Vector potential)
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Visualizing fields around coils (statics and magnetostatics)
Replies
5
Views
933

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top