Symmetry behind charged spring-mass system in Electric field

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the symmetry in a charged spring-mass system within an electric field, where the rest position is defined as x = EQ/k and the maximum position as x = 2EQ/k. The symmetry observed is that the maximum position equals the rest position plus the amplitude of the motion, which is EQ/k. This scenario is analogous to a vertical spring-mass system, where the electric force EQ acts similarly to gravitational force mg. The confusion about symmetry arises from misinterpreting the relationship between amplitude and position. The key takeaway is that the amplitude directly influences the positions in this charged system.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1673242419091.png

If we assume that x = 0 is where the spring connects to the wall, then the rest position of the mass-spring-electric field position is x = EQ/k and the max position is x = 2EQ/k. Is there a reason for the symmetry between the rest position and max position? (The symmetry being: max position = rest position + EQ/k)

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reason is that in this case EQ/k is the amplitude of the motion. Note that this problem is equivalent to a vertical spring mass system with EQ replacing mg.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
kuruman said:
The reason is that in this case EQ/k is the amplitude of the motion. Note that this problem is equivalent to a vertical spring mass system with EQ replacing mg.
Thanks for your reply @kuruman! Whoops, forgot amplitude was max position - rest position, why was I thinking about symmetry??!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
968
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K