Chemistry Synthesis of Caffeine from Theobromine

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the synthesis of caffeine from theobromine, specifically exploring safer alternatives for N-Methylation. Methyl iodide is noted as safer than dimethyl sulfate but still poses safety concerns for use in school settings. The participant inquires about the possibility of using a safer reagent for N-Methylation, acknowledging the hazards associated with typical alkylation agents. Dimethyl carbonate is mentioned as a potential alternative, though its effectiveness and yield may be questionable. The conversation emphasizes the need for safer methods in chemical synthesis while recognizing the inherent risks of alkylation.
Lachlan
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Not specifically a homework question, but I need help about an idea I'm exploring for a depth study for school. I'm looking into synthesizing caffeine from theobromine, and my understanding of current procedures is that methyl iodide is a reagent (or dimethyl sulphate could be used instead) for the purpose of adding a methyl group to a Nitrogen on the theobromine molecule to turn it into caffeine. I have been told that I am not allowed to use either reagents due to safety factors, is there any other reagent that could be used or explored for the same purpose of adding a methyl group, that is safer?
Relevant Equations
N-Methylation of theobromine
Most of what I'm going off is from this article here - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0187893X15720926#bib0115. This presents methyl iodide as safer than dimethyl sulphate, which is true and helpful, but not safe enough for me to be able to use it at school. I understand its purpose in the reaction, as the N-Methylation is adding the methyl group, making it a caffeine molecule. What I'm asking is if this N-Methylation can happen with a safer reagent? If it can't then let me know too as then I'll look to pursue something else, but whatever you know helps.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Methylation properties (alkylation in general) is a huge hazard in chemical reagents. Good alkylation agents are typically dangerous as an intrinsic side-effect of their desired purpose.

From what I could find, dimethyl carbonate is a safe(r) alternative but also reported as weak, so yield might be questionable. You would also need basic conditions to deprotonate the imide. It's not clear that it would work at all btw.
 
Thank you very much, I will look into as much as I can.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top