System of second order linear coupled pde with constant coefficient

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the uncoupling of a system of second order linear partial differential equations (PDEs) with constant coefficients. Participants explore methods to solve the equations in one, two, and three dimensions, potentially using Green's functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks assistance in uncoupling the given system of PDEs and expresses a desire for solutions in multiple dimensions.
  • Another participant suggests a transformation using new variables y_1 and y_2, which may allow the equations to separate under the right choice of constants.
  • A participant questions the classification of the problem as a PDE, pointing out that it appears to involve only a single independent variable.
  • A later reply clarifies that the variable x is intended to represent a vector in three-dimensional space, addressing the previous concern.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the classification of the problem as a PDE, as one participant questions this while another clarifies the dimensionality of the variable involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to uncouple the system.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of the variables and the dimensionality of the problem, which may affect the proposed methods for uncoupling the equations.

galuoises
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Someone know how to uncouple this system of pde?

Δu_{1}(x) + a u_{1}(x) + b u_{2}(x) =f(x)
Δu_{2}(x) + c u_{1}(x) + d u_{2}(x) =g(x)

a,b,c,d are constant.

I would like to find a solution in one, two, three dimension, possibily in terms of Green function...someone could help me, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let

y_1 = u_1 + \lambda_1 u_2, \qquad y_2 = u_1 + \lambda_2 u_2
where \lambda_1, \lambda_2 are constants. For the right choice of constants, the equations will separate when written in terms of y_1, y_2.

\lambda_{1,2} will have to solve a quadratic equation that involves a, b, c, d, hence generically you will get two roots.
 
Why do you refer to this as a "PDE" when you have only the single independent variable, x?
 
Thank you so much Ben Niehoff!

Sorry for the notation for the variable x, HallsofIvy, I intended it is a vector
x\equiv(x,y,z)
and
Δ\equiv\partial_{xx}+\partial_{yy}+\partial_{zz}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
925
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K