T-Invariant Subspaces: Proving W is T-Invariant for E_{\lambda}

  • Thread starter Thread starter hitmeoff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
hitmeoff
Messages
260
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that W is a T-invariant subspace of T for:
W = E[tex]_{\lambda}[/tex]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I know that I need to show that T maps every element in E[tex]_{\lambda}[/tex] to .

E[tex]_{\lambda}[/tex] = N(T-[tex]\lambda[/tex]I)

so T must map every eigenvector related to [tex]\lambda[/tex] to another eigenvector in E[tex]_{\lambda}[/tex]

T(x) maps to zero vector, when x is an eigenvector associated with [tex]\lambda[/tex] which is in the eigenspace of [tex]\lambda[/tex], correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok I get it now. [tex]E^{\lambda}[/tex] is the set of all eigenvectors with eigenvalue [tex]\lambda[/tex]. Let's say v is an eigenvector, and [tex]Tv=\lambda v[/tex]. What is [tex]T(\lambda v)[/tex] and how does this help you answer the question?
 
Office_Shredder said:
Ok I get it now. [tex]E^{\lambda}[/tex] is the set of all eigenvectors with eigenvalue [tex]\lambda[/tex]. Let's say v is an eigenvector, and [tex]Tv=\lambda v[/tex]. What is [tex]T(\lambda v)[/tex] and how does this help you answer the question?

T([tex]\lambda[/tex]v) = [tex]\lambda[/tex]2v

and this is just a multiple of T, so T(v) = [tex]\lambda[/tex]v maps to the eigenspace?
 
and another question...

Show that W is a T-invariant subspace when

W = N(T)

So N(T) : { x E W: T(x) = 0} , since W is a subspace it contains the zero vector, thus any vector in N(T) will map to zero which is in W?