Taking the Second Derivative w/ the Quotient Rule: What if Numerator = 0?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the second derivative using the quotient rule, specifically for the function s(t) = (t^2 - 2)/(t + 1). The first derivative, v(t), is correctly derived as v(t) = (t^2 + 2t + 2)/(t + 1)^2. The second derivative, a(t), is calculated as a(t) = -2/(t + 1)^3. The key takeaway is that one must differentiate v(t) to find acceleration a(t) rather than substituting directly into v(t).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, specifically derivatives
  • Familiarity with the quotient rule for differentiation
  • Knowledge of evaluating functions at specific points
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the quotient rule in detail to solidify understanding of its application
  • Practice finding first and second derivatives of various functions
  • Learn about the implications of acceleration in motion analysis
  • Explore advanced calculus topics such as higher-order derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians, and anyone involved in physics or engineering who requires a solid grasp of derivatives and their applications in motion analysis.

mathmann
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Just wondering how you take the second derivative when using the quotient rule. After using the quotient rule to get my first derivative, I tried again and the numerator ended up as 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show us your exact working?
 
s(t) = t^2 - 2/t + 1, is the object speeing up at 4s?
v(t) = 1.04, a(t) the numerator ended up as a 0. Perhaps I made a calculating error but I went over it a couple times.
 
You mean s(t) = (t^2 - 2)/(t + 1) right?

Then v(t) = (t^2 + 2t + 2)/(t+1)^2

and a(t) = - 2/ (t+1)^3
 
When you evaluate v(t) at some fixed t you get the velocity at that point in time. You are not supposed to differentiate that particular velocity to get the acceleration at that time. You need to work out a(t) first by differentiating the function v(t) before substituting in your fixed t.
 
I understand now.. thanks for the help.
 
No problem :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
885
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
993
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K