Tangential and radial coordinate problem. Confused about the FBD.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the free body diagram (FBD) in a polar coordinate system, specifically the relationship between the tangential acceleration (a_t) and the angular acceleration (a_θ). Participants clarify that in polar coordinates, the radial direction (e_r) extends outward from the origin, while the tangential direction (e_θ) is perpendicular to it. The force exerted by the rod on the particle is normal to the rod's surface, confirming that a_θ does not equal a_t. The distinction between the tangential vectors related to the particle's motion and the rod's rotation is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their unit vectors (e_r and e_θ).
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams (FBD) in physics.
  • Knowledge of tangential and normal components of motion.
  • Basic concepts of angular acceleration and its relation to linear acceleration.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of polar coordinates in mechanics.
  • Learn about free body diagram construction for various coordinate systems.
  • Explore the relationship between angular and linear motion in detail.
  • Investigate the concepts of normal and tangential forces in rotational dynamics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators and anyone involved in teaching or learning about polar coordinates and free body diagrams.

theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is a picture of the problem with the free body diagram:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64325990/HW%20Pictures/problem101.PNG

I am confused about why the free body diagram has the force vector in the direction of the aθ. When I did it I thought the force that the rod would exert on the particle would be in the tangential direction? In other words in the direction of at.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see a_t in your pic.

But anyway, I am pretty sure that the tangential direction is the theta direction as well.
So a_theta = a_t

In polar coordinates the radial direction is out from the origin, and the theta direction is perpendicular to that, which would be the tangential direction.
 
spacelike said:
I don't see a_t in your pic.

But anyway, I am pretty sure that the tangential direction is the theta direction as well.
So a_theta = a_t

In polar coordinates the radial direction is out from the origin, and the theta direction is perpendicular to that, which would be the tangential direction.

No the unit vector in the tangential direction (u_t) is perpendicular to the normal direction. a_theta != a_t..

I edited the picture slightly to show the direction of a_t which is in the direction of it's unit vector u_t.
 
i'll just add this to what spacelike :smile: says …

in polar coordinates, the actual coordinates are r,θ,

and so the unit vectors for increasing r (with fixed θ), and for increasing θ (with fixed r) are called er and eθ, respectively

(or \boldsymbol{\hat{r}} and \boldsymbol{\hat{θ}})

and their velocity or acceleration components therefore have the same subscripts

(and of course, t isn't a coordinate :wink:)
 
I think I understand your confusion. There are two tangential vectors you could define. One would be the vector that is tangential to the motion of the particle and the other is tangential to any point on the rod which is rotating (but at a constant distance from the origin). The second one must be in the theta direction which is perp. to the rod. The force from the rod MUST be that force which is normal to the surface of the rod. Unless there are strange things going on, the only interaction between the rod and particle must be normal to the rod. The force that you are thinking about that would be in the u_t direction is the net force on the particle. If that were asked, you would be correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
998
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K