Taylor Expand Lagrangian to Second Order....

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 4K views
sa1988
Messages
221
Reaction score
23

Homework Statement



NOTE - When I post the thread my embedded images aren't showing up on my web browser, but they do show up when I bring it up to edit, so I don't know if other users can see the pictures or not... If not, they're here:
Problem outline: http://tinypic.com/r/34jeihj/9
Solution: http://tinypic.com/r/algpqh/9

2zxtiro.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Given that x and x2 in the Lagrangian don't need expanding, I simply took the Sin and Cos parts up to their x2 terms and replaced them accordingly in the Lagrangian. However the given solution (below) seems to have done things rather differently. In particular I notice the 4a2x2 term and the Sin term have both become zero.

Can anyone explain why this is? Some obvious algebra error on my part, or a fundamental aspect of Taylor expansions that I haven't properly grasped? Many thanks.

algpqh.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stevendaryl said:
Well, the term proportional to [itex]x \dot{x} \dot{\theta} sin(\theta)[/itex] is 4th order (treating [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]\theta[/itex] as the same order).

Ahhh, so yes it was a fundamental error in understanding on my part.

Back to basics for me...

Thanks