Taylor Series Expansion of Gravitational Field: Benefits & Uses

  • Thread starter Thread starter scott_alexsk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the utility of Taylor series expansion in analyzing the gravitational field of a ring. The original poster questions the advantages of using a Taylor series over direct limit calculations to understand asymptotic behavior, specifically when approaching the field of a point mass. They provide the gravitational field equation and express skepticism about the necessity of the Taylor expansion for deriving useful insights. Participants clarify that while direct limits can yield results, Taylor series can offer more detailed approximations and insights into the behavior of the field near specific points. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the value of Taylor expansions in providing a broader understanding of gravitational fields beyond simple asymptotic analysis.
scott_alexsk
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
...to do a Taylor series expansion of an expression for the gravitational field? My physics teacher did a it few times on the board, but I do not understand how it gives me more information about the asymptotic behavior than substituting some scaled factor in for r, and then solving the limit as that dimensionless number goes to 0 or infinity. (i.e. finding the field of a uniform ring w/ radius d and distance r away from something, approaches the field of a point mass as r goes to infinity or d goes to zero). Maybe it is useful for something else?

Thanks,
-Scott
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
can you be a little more specific?
 
Sorry in advance for not using latex...

So if I have the equation for the gravitational field of a ring, g=G*m*z/(z^2+r^2)^1.5 (where z is the distance to some point along a line perpindicular to the center of the ring, and r is the radius of the ring), what useful thing can I get out of making a Taylor series for this equation?

I was saying before that I can already find information about the asymptotic behavior by setting v=r/z, and then plugging it into the equation and solving for the limit as v goes to zero (to show that the gravitational field of the ring approaches a point mass as the distance from it goes to infinity, or r goes to zero etc.) So I conclude from this that I don't need a Taylor expansion to determine the asymptotic behavior.

So just to rephrase, is there any reason why I would want to make a Taylor series expansion for the field function? My teacher certainly knows what he is doing, but I missed the point for doing the expansion.

Thanks,
-Scott
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Back
Top