Newtons Law of Gravity Legendre Polynomial & Harmonic functions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Newton's law of gravitation to derive harmonic functions using Legendre polynomials. The method involves expressing the distance between points in a gravitational field and applying the law of cosines to simplify calculations. Substitutions are made to facilitate expansion using the binomial theorem, leading to a series representation of the gravitational potential. The coefficients of the expansion correspond to Legendre polynomials, which are derived from the spherical coordinate form of Laplace's equation. The conversation highlights differences in derivation approaches found in various physics textbooks, noting that newer texts provide clearer explanations.
John Creighto
Messages
487
Reaction score
2
I'm reading section 17 of Mathematical Physics by Donald H. Menzel on Harmonic functions.

They start with Newtons law of gravitation (although the following method can be aplied to any potential field with a 1/r dependence.)
see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legendre_polynomials#Applications_of_Legendre_polynomials_in_physics

dV=-\frac{GdM}{r_{12}}=\frac{GdM}{(r_2^2-2r_1r_2 cos \gamma + r_1^2)^{1/2}}

Where:
R_{12}=The distance from P1 to the unit volume
R_{1} is the distrance from the orgin to the unit volume
R{2} is the distance from P1 to the orgin.
note that the law of cosines was used to express R_{12} in terms of R_1 and R_2

The substitutions:

cos \gamma = \mu
\frac{r_1}{r_2}=\Beta_1

are made giving:

dV=-\frac{GdM}{r_2} \left[ 1 - \beta (2 \mu - \beta) \right]^{-1/2}

This is expanded using the more general form of the binomial theorem:dV=-\frac{GdM}{r_2} \left[ 1 + \frac{1}{2}\beta (2\mu - \beta ) + \frac{1*2}{2*4}\beta^2(2\mu-\beta)^2+... \right]

Now here is I where I get lost. If you expand and collect the terms (powers of \beta) then supposedly the coefficients are:

P_l(\mu )=\frac{(2l)!}{2^l(l!)^2} \left[ u^l - \frac{l(l-1)}{2(2(l-1)}\mu^{l-2}+\frac{l(l-1)(l-2)(l-3)}{2 * 4(2l-1)(2l-3)}\mu^{l-4}... \right]

and apparently the numerical coefficients can be represented as follows:

\frac{(2l)!}{2^l(l!)^2}=\frac{(2l-1)(2l-3)...1}{l!}

This then gives:
dV=-\frac{GdM}{r_2} \sum_{l=0}^{\inf}P_l(\mu ) \left( \frac{r_1}{r_2} \right)^l
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Newer physics books give clearer derivations.
Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates, leads to Legendre's equation.
Then your last formula is a special case.
In Menzel's method, terms like (2mu-beta)^n have to be expanded in the binomial expansion,and then the pattern recognized.
Some books (Arfken) go backwards, using your last equation to defined the LPs.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top