Debunking the Myths of Teleportation: The Truth Behind Quantum State Transfer

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZapperZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Teleportation
ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
32,814
Reaction score
4,725
Teleportation... AGAIN!

OK, so am I the only one who gets annoyed after reading an article like this?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20050708/sc_space/teleportationexpresslanespacetravel

It is of no wonder that most people do not understand that a "teleportation" of a quantum state is NOT the same as those star trek teleportation. The line between these two are thoroughly blurred in this article.

I'm all for selling the importance of physics, especially the field one is working in. But honestly, this over-extension of what we know can be detrimental to the field itself.

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Zz,

Remember that these articles are written by jounralists for John Q Public so that they write their Congressmen and Senators to fund science in general. Self respecting scientists do not publish in online magazines like Space.com. A poll of the average person would tell you that they believe probably more than 95% of what they read on the internet.

I agree, the line was completely blurred in this article. We don't understand enough about the phenomenon to make claims like that. I consider the article to be "Science Fiction", very little science mostly fiction as I do most articles I read on Yahoo News. I take them with a grain of salt, consider the source and go on doing good science. Eventually the truth will come out and these guys will be put in their place. I don't think I'll ever see it, but sometime down the road.

Dr T
 
This "article" seems like more of a blurb for a book than anything else. I share your frustration. Articles like this tend to foster misconceptions that usually undo any good they might do.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top