Temperature related to yield or type of explosion? Nuclear vs conventional.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between temperature and yield in nuclear versus conventional explosions. Participants explore whether the temperatures produced in nuclear reactions are unique and how they compare to those generated by conventional explosives like TNT, particularly in terms of energy concentration and crater size resulting from explosions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the temperatures produced from nuclear reactions are special compared to those from conventional explosives with equivalent yields.
  • One participant argues that the concentration of energy in a small volume leads to higher temperatures in nuclear explosions compared to the larger volume of conventional explosives.
  • There is a discussion about the independence of temperature from energy yield, with some participants asserting that temperature correlates with yield when considering the volume of the energy source.
  • Participants express interest in finding resources or calculators for estimating yield versus crater size for ground contact explosions.
  • One participant mentions the Sedan Underground Test as a reference point for estimating crater sizes related to explosive yields.
  • Another participant seeks to estimate the yield required to create a 1000-meter deep transient crater, speculating on the potential impact of the Tsar Bomba if detonated as a surface blast.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between temperature and yield, with differing views on whether temperature is independent of energy yield and how the two types of explosions compare. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of crater size estimates and the necessary yields for significant geological impacts.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations in finding specific calculators or programs for yield versus crater size, indicating a potential gap in accessible resources. There is also uncertainty regarding the mathematical relationships involved in estimating crater sizes from explosive yields.

Researcher X
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Are the temperatures produced from a nuclear reaction special in anyway? If a 20 kiloton nuke is producing hundreds of thousands of degrees at it's center, would the same ballpark be true of 20,000 tons of TNT, which is roughly equal in yield?
 
Science news on Phys.org
No - it's a question of concentrating the energy.
20,000 t of TNT fills a rather inconveniently large warehouse - putting all that energy into a few cm^3 of core is tricky.
 
So, temperature is independent of yield of energy?

I'd also like to know if you could point me somewhere I can find estimates of yield versus crater size (possibly a calculator or program) for ground contact explosions.
 
Researcher X said:
So, temperature is independent of yield of energy?

No. As mgb was saying, you get higher temperatures in the nuke case because the volume of the energy source is so much smaller initially. The temperature for both nuke and TNT ratios with yield.

Researcher X said:
I'd also like to know if you could point me somewhere I can find estimates of yield versus crater size (possibly a calculator or program) for ground contact explosions.

Seems a pretty easy thing to find with Google. No luck?
 
No luck, actually. There's plenty to do with fireball/blast radius. I seem to remember one which was a program which showed the height of a building in the crater, but I think that might have been an asteroid impact one.
 
Researcher X said:
No luck, actually. There's plenty to do with fireball/blast radius. I seem to remember one which was a program which showed the height of a building in the crater, but I think that might have been an asteroid impact one.

I just googled your words -- yield versus crater size, and got lots of hits. The first one is this thread here at the PF (gotta love those Google spiders), but the rest look promising. What about the 2nd hit on the list -- does it help?

http://www.google.com/search?source...GGLL_enUS301US302&q=yield+versus+crater+size+
 
Last edited:
Sort of, but I'm not good at maths, so I'll have to take some time working out what the formula mean. I'm actually trying to estimate how large a yield you'd need to create a 1000 meter deep transient crater. If Tsar Bomba had been a surface blast, could it have done this? I'm wondering how much power you'd need to eradicate a mountain, which is why I use "1000 meters".

I know that the Sedan Underground Test (104 kilotons) created a 100 meter deep permanent crater (the very largest man made crater), so I would guess we are talking many many Megatons here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K