Tennis ball hit by racket (momentum problem I think)

  • Thread starter Thread starter aero_zeppelin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Tennis
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the final velocity of a tennis ball after being struck by a racket, utilizing the force equation F(t) = 72t - 442t² N over a time interval of 0.1 seconds. The initial momentum of the ball, given its mass of 0.022 kg and initial velocity of 3.1 m/s at an angle of 222°, is calculated, and the change in momentum (Δp) is derived through integration. The final velocity is determined to be (6.05 i + 3.2 j) m/s, although participants note that integral calculus is not required for the course, leading to discussions on alternative methods and the correct interpretation of the force equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of momentum and its calculation (p = mv)
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, specifically integration
  • Familiarity with vector components and trigonometric functions
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion and force equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of integration in physics problems, particularly in momentum calculations
  • Learn about vector decomposition and how to resolve forces into components
  • Explore alternative methods for solving momentum problems without calculus
  • Review the principles of Newton's laws and their application in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to momentum and force calculations.

aero_zeppelin
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A tennis ball of mass 0.022 kg is moving at 3.1 m/s at an angle of 222° to the horizontal. It is struck by a racket which exerts a force on it of 72t - 442 t^2 N for 1/10 of a second at an angle 32° to the horizontal. Find the final velocity of the tennis ball (Express answer using i and j unit vectors)

Homework Equations



So, I guess this is a momentum problem...?)

p = mv (momentum)
Δp = pf - pi


The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt here was the next:

1.- Integrate the force exerted by racket, using tf = 0.1 s and ti = 0
Δp = ∫ F dt = 0.218 Km m / s

2.- Divide Δp in x and y components, by multiplying 0.218 by cos 222° and sin 222°, respectively.

3.- Obtain ball's momentum, in components also:
px initial = (0.022 kg)(3.1 m/s) cos 32°
py initial = (0.022 kg)(3.1 m/s) sin 32°

4.- Using Δp = pfinal - pinitial, solve for pfinal, which is (mass)(vel. final), then solve for
vel. final.

v final = (Δp + p initial) / mass = (6.05 i + 3.2 j) m/s


That's what I got... They said integral calculus was not needed (even though it's a pretty easy integral) for this course I'm taking lol, but after some thinking this is the only way I think this can be solved.

Any comments? Any other way to solve it w/o integral calculus?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm... the force is meant to be (72t - 442 t^2) N right? But this clearly doesn't have the physical dimensions of force. Unless t is a dimensionless parameter. (for example, time per second). What does the question say, specifically?

edit: When I said "for example, time per second", I meant the total elapsed time divided by the time for one second to elapse. In other words, a ratio of time intervals. This is just one example, so for your equation, it may be a different ratio. I'm guessing there is more information given in the question?
 
Last edited:
BruceW said:
hmm... the force is meant to be (72t - 442 t^2) N right? But this clearly doesn't have the physical dimensions of force. Unless t is a dimensionless parameter. (for example, time per second). What does the question say, specifically?

edit: When I said "for example, time per second", I meant the total elapsed time divided by the time for one second to elapse. In other words, a ratio of time intervals. This is just one example, so for your equation, it may be a different ratio. I'm guessing there is more information given in the question?


I know! I've never seen force expressed like this hehe... It has NEWTONS, so the dimensions are correct I guess. Those t's mean that the force can vary with time maybe? You are asked to find the final velocity on the ball after that force was exerted.
All the information is there, there's nothing more :P hehe
 
The question does not give enough information. But I think I can guess what t is meant to be.
aero_zeppelin said:
It has NEWTONS, so the dimensions are correct I guess.
the equation for force is: (72t - 442 t^2) N And we want it to have dimensions of Newtons, so this tells you something important about the dimensions of t. From this, what do you guess t is meant to be?
 
BruceW said:
The question does not give enough information. But I think I can guess what t is meant to be.

the equation for force is: (72t - 442 t^2) N And we want it to have dimensions of Newtons, so this tells you something important about the dimensions of t. From this, what do you guess t is meant to be?

I don't quite get it... We already have Newtons, but we want to get Newtons? hehe I am guessing you could also plug in TIME where those t's are and get the total force that was exerted during that time interval ?
 
You interpreted the badly worded problem correctly, and the method of solution is correct, but there are mistakes in it.

aero_zeppelin said:
A tennis ball of mass 0.022 kg is moving at 3.1 m/s at an angle of 222° to the horizontal. It is struck by a racket which exerts a force on it of 72t - 442 t^2 N for 1/10 of a second at an angle 32° to the horizontal. Find the final velocity of the tennis ball (Express answer using i and j unit vectors)

It is said that the force is in Newtons. It would be essential to give information about t, like "t is time in seconds, starting when the ball hits the racket". As the timespan of the interaction is given as 0.1 s we can conclude that t is time in seconds, elapsed from the beginning of the interaction. The coefficients of t and t2 must have dimensions and units, the correct form of F(t) would be F(t)=72(Ns-1)t-442 (Ns-2)t2.

aero_zeppelin said:
My attempt here was the next:

1.- Integrate the force exerted by racket, using tf = 0.1 s and ti = 0
Δp = ∫ F dt = 0.218 Km m / s

The principle is correct, but the result is not. Check the unit. K (Kelvin) is the unit of temperature. Use kg for mass. And the dimension of Δp is [mass][length][time]-1. The numerical value is also inaccurate.

aero_zeppelin said:
2.- Divide Δp in x and y components, by multiplying 0.218 by cos 222° and sin 222°, respectively.


3.- Obtain ball's momentum, in components also:
px initial = (0.022 kg)(3.1 m/s) cos 32°
py initial = (0.022 kg)(3.1 m/s) sin 32°

Check the text of the problem. You mixed the directions.

ehild
 
aero_zeppelin said:
I don't quite get it... We already have Newtons, but we want to get Newtons? hehe I am guessing you could also plug in TIME where those t's are and get the total force that was exerted during that time interval ?

If you put in time where those t's are, then we certainly won't have Newtons. You need to remember that time is another physical dimension. so time is 0.1seconds or (1/600)minutes e.t.c.

So we know the total time is 0.1seconds, but we want a dimensionless number. I think your teacher is hoping that you use your intuition to guess what that dimensionless number is meant to be. What was your guess?
 
ehild said:
You interpreted the badly worded problem correctly, and the method of solution is correct, but there are mistakes in it.



It is said that the force is in Newtons. It would be essential to give information about t, like "t is time in seconds, starting when the ball hits the racket". As the timespan of the interaction is given as 0.1 s we can conclude that t is time in seconds, elapsed from the beginning of the interaction. The coefficients of t and t2 must have dimensions and units, the correct form of F(t) would be F(t)=72(Ns-1)t-442 (Ns-2)t2.



The principle is correct, but the result is not. Check the unit. K (Kelvin) is the unit of temperature. Use kg for mass. And the dimension of Δp is [mass][length][time]-1. The numerical value is also inaccurate.



Check the text of the problem. You mixed the directions.

ehild


lolll yeah, it's supposed to be Kg in there, not Kelvin. Just a typing mistake. But you also mentioned the numerical value is incorrect...

Well, like I said, I wasn't supposed to be doing integral calculus in this subject, but here I am attempting an integral... I had the limits of the definite integral be tf = 0.1 s and ti = 0 and obtained Δp = 0.218 Kg m/s

What did you get as an answer? Also, if there's another method that doesn't require calculus, I'd appreciate a hint hehe
 
aero_zeppelin said:
lolll yeah, it's supposed to be Kg in there, not Kelvin. Just a typing mistake. But you also mentioned the numerical value is incorrect...

Well, like I said, I wasn't supposed to be doing integral calculus in this subject, but here I am attempting an integral... I had the limits of the definite integral be tf = 0.1 s and ti = 0 and obtained Δp = 0.218 Kg m/s

What did you get as an answer? Also, if there's another method that doesn't require calculus, I'd appreciate a hint hehe

I think you need calculus. ∫Fdt==72t2/2-442 t3/3 at t=0.1 equals to 0.213 kg m/s.

ehild
 
  • #10
ehild said:
I think you need calculus. ∫Fdt==72t2/2-442 t3/3 at t=0.1 equals to 0.213 kg m/s.

ehild

Guess I'll have to learn those integrals before time hehe thanks a bunch for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
4K