I Tension/compression in curved truss? (Diagram attached)

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Smilemore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Truss
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the correct labeling of tension and compression in a diagram of a curved truss that extends into a full circle. It is noted that the system is statically indeterminate, complicating the analysis. A more specific inquiry is raised regarding the stress patterns on the truss members when the central spokes are uniformly tightened from a relaxed state. Participants are encouraged to visualize the truss members as springs, considering how they would react under the inward load from the cables. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately assessing the structural behavior of the truss.
Smilemore
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
In the diagram, are the tension/compression labels in the correct position? The curve shown continues into a full circle, with the load pulling inwards from the cables shown
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20220311_092141544.jpg
    PXL_20220311_092141544.jpg
    42.1 KB · Views: 165
Physics news on Phys.org
Smilemore said:
In the diagram, are the tension/compression labels in the correct position? The curve shown continues into a full circle, with the load pulling inwards from the cables shown
Who can say? It is statically indeterminate.

Possibly you want to answer the more specific and difficult question:

"Suppose that the curved truss is put in place with all members relaxed. Now the central spokes are tightened uniformly. What is the resulting pattern of stresses on the truss members now?"
 
Imagine that each of those elements are springs that can be either compressed (shortening) or tensioned (elongating).
What do you think each will tend to do under the load of those cables?
 

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Understanding tension and centripedal force in a puck and weight
Replies
4
Views
2K
B What is tension and how does it affect a rope?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Why are these pulleys equivalent?
Replies
16
Views
1K
What do the numbers in the method of joints analysis for trusses represent?
Replies
3
Views
3K
Forces in a Howe truss (2D) pinned at BOTH ends
Replies
18
Views
6K
I Drawbridge falling before caught by rope/cable - Max force
Replies
13
Views
2K
Tensile and compressive forces
Replies
2
Views
7K
Engineering Crane at 45-degree angle supports load -- Find principal boom stresses
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Modeling Coulomb Friction for a Moving Point Mass in a Circular Bowl
Replies
20
Views
1K
B Rotational Dynamics: Confused about the tension in this string pulling a mass up an incline
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top