Tension of string and circular motion question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the forces acting on an object of mass M suspended from a string and spinning in a horizontal circle. Initially, the force of gravity is correctly identified as [0,0,-Mg], with tension also at [0,0,Mg] when the object is at rest. When the object begins to spin, the tension force direction changes, and the magnitude of tension is proposed to be (Mv^2)/R. However, it's clarified that the angle the string makes with the vertical must be specified for accurate calculations, and drawing the forces acting on the object is recommended for better understanding. Overall, the need to analyze the forces more thoroughly is emphasized to avoid guesswork.
Signifier
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Let's say I hang an object of mass M from a string attached to the ceiling. The force of gravity on this object at rest would be [0,0,-Mg]. The tension force I assume would be [0,0,Mg] by Newton's third law. (Am I right on this?)

Next, assume I start the object spinning in a horizontal circle at a constant speed v. The force of gravity still points down, but the direction of the force of tension is now rotated. Let's say theta is the angle the end of the string (where the object is attached) makes with the horizontal axis, that the string is S meters long and that the circle the object is spinning has a constant radius R.

Now is where I start guessing, essentially. The magnitude of the tension force would be (Mv^2)/R (by using Newton's second law and the fact that for uniform circ. motion the acceleration a = (v^2)/R). The vector of the tension force would be (Mv^2)/R multiplied by [cos(theta),sin(theta),0]. Is this right?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Signifier said:
Let's say I hang an object of mass M from a string attached to the ceiling. The force of gravity on this object at rest would be [0,0,-Mg]. The tension force I assume would be [0,0,Mg] by Newton's third law. (Am I right on this?)
No. Whatever makes you think this has something about Newton's 3.law?
The tension is certainly (0,0, Mg), but that result follws from Newton's 2.law and that the object experiences no acceleration.
Next, assume I start the object spinning in a horizontal circle at a constant speed v. The force of gravity still points down, but the direction of the force of tension is now rotated. Let's say theta is the angle the end of the string (where the object is attached) makes with the horizontal axis, that the string is S meters long and that the circle the object is spinning has a constant radius R.

Now is where I start guessing, essentially. The magnitude of the tension force would be (Mv^2)/R (by using Newton's second law and the fact that for uniform circ. motion the acceleration a = (v^2)/R). The vector of the tension force would be (Mv^2)/R multiplied by [cos(theta),sin(theta),0]. Is this right?
No.

1. You need to specify the angle the string makes with the VERTICAL.
Assume that one is fixed. (i.e, the string traces out a cone in 3-D).
see if you can work further on this.
 
If you have a problem like this, it is actually quite easy to get a feeling for what is happening: you know by experience that the tension in the string will be
- lower?
- higher?
when rotating the object of mass M around the z-axis. Now, your next step is quite alright in general terms. You're assuming constant speed at a fixed radius R. Try drawing the forces acting on the object and the tension in the string. Note that the tension force MUST be in the direction of the string. Then include the force acting on the object due to your circular motion.

The situation should be more clear after doing this, and you shouldn't be in need of a guess.

Best regrads

Cliowa

Edit: There are always people faster than me, bad luck. I hope it helps anyway,
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top