Tensor calculus, dummy indices

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the manipulation of dummy indices in tensor calculus, specifically regarding the equation involving the Levi-Civita symbol, \(\epsilon_{kpq}\). The user demonstrates that by renaming dummy indices in separate terms, they can simplify the expression for \(w_k\) to \(w_k = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{kqp} \frac{\partial u_p}{\partial x_q}\). The conclusion drawn is that it is valid to change dummy indices when the terms are separated, confirming the correctness of the final expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor calculus and dummy indices
  • Familiarity with the Levi-Civita symbol and its properties
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their notation
  • Basic skills in mathematical manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Levi-Civita symbol in detail
  • Learn about tensor notation and operations in depth
  • Explore examples of dummy index manipulation in tensor equations
  • Investigate applications of tensor calculus in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students who are working with tensor calculus and need to understand the manipulation of indices in tensor equations.

Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30
Hi there. When I have dummy indices in a tensor equation with separate terms, I wanted to know if I can rename the dummies in the separate terms.

I have, in particular:

\displaystyle w_k=-\frac{1}{4}\epsilon_{kpq}\left [ \frac{\partial u_p}{\partial x_q}-\frac{\partial u_q}{\partial x_p} \right ]=-\frac{1}{4}\epsilon_{kpq}\frac{\partial u_p}{\partial x_q}+\frac{1}{4}\epsilon_{kpq}\frac{\partial u_q}{\partial x_p}=\frac{1}{4}\epsilon_{kqp}\frac{\partial u_p}{\partial x_q}+\frac{1}{4}\epsilon_{kpq}\frac{\partial u_q}{\partial x_p}

I've used that \epsilon_{kpq}=-\epsilon_{kqp}

So, if I can change the dummy indices for the separate terms I can use that:

\frac{1}{4}\epsilon_{kpq}\frac{\partial u_q}{\partial x_p}=\frac{1}{4}\epsilon_{kqp}\frac{\partial u_p}{\partial x_q}
to get:
w_k= \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{kqp} \frac{\partial u_p}{\partial x_q}

which is the result I'm looking for, but I wasn't sure if the last step is right.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mhm, I think that it suffices to just take separate sums for the different terms to see that yes, I just can change the dummies.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K