Tensor of inertia - hollow cube.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The tensor of inertia for a hollow cube of side 'a' around its center of mass is calculated using the parallel axis theorem. The correct formula is I11 = I22 = I33 = (5/3)ma², where 'm' is the mass of the cube. This result accounts for contributions from all sides of the cube, not just one. The initial incorrect calculation only considered one side, leading to an incomplete understanding of the tensor's components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor of inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with the parallel axis theorem
  • Basic knowledge of geometry related to cubes and rectangles
  • Ability to perform algebraic manipulations with physical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the tensor of inertia for various geometric shapes
  • Learn about the application of the parallel axis theorem in different contexts
  • Explore the implications of tensor of inertia in rotational dynamics
  • Investigate the differences in inertia calculations for solid versus hollow objects
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, particularly those focusing on mechanics and dynamics, as well as educators teaching concepts related to inertia and rotational motion.

peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Homework Statement


I have found the tensor of inertia of a rectangle of sides a and b and mass m, around its center, to be I11=ma2/12, I22=mb2/12, I33=(ma2 + mb2)/12. All other elements of that tensor are equal to zero. I would now like to use this result to determine the tensor of inertia of a hollow cube of side a around its center of mass.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I realize I have to use the parallel axis theorem. I have hence tried the following:
I11=ma2/12 + m(a/2)2, which yielded the wrong answer.
I know that the correct equation is I11=I22=I33=ma2/12+ma2/12+ma2/6+4(ma2/12 + m(a/2)2)=5/3*ma2
I simply do not understand why this is correct. Could anyone please explain why this is the correct way to calculate the desired tensor of inertia? Also, why would I be summing all the diagonal elements in my tensor for the rectangle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
peripatein said:
I realize I have to use the parallel axis theorem. I have hence tried the following:
I11=ma2/12 + m(a/2)2, which yielded the wrong answer.

Doesn't this give the contribution of only one of the sides of the cube? What about the other sides?
 

Attachments

  • Cube.png
    Cube.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 2,644

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K