Terminal velocity for big objects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the terminal velocity of large objects like cars and planes, where the drag force is proportional to the square of the velocity. The key formula derived for terminal velocity is Vterm = mg/b, where 'm' is mass, 'g' is gravitational acceleration, and 'b' is a characteristic dimension related to the object's shape. Participants express confusion about the initial setup and calculations, particularly regarding the inclusion of a square root in the equation. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between drag force and gravitational force at terminal velocity. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for clarity in applying physics equations to solve for terminal velocity.
cleverfield
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The drag force on large objects such as cars, planes, and sky divers moving through air is more nearly Fdrag = -bv^2.

For this quadratic dependence on v, determine a formula for the terminal velocity vTerm, of a vertically falling object.

Express your answer in terms of the variables m, b, and appropriate constants.

Homework Equations


Vterm = mg/b


The Attempt at a Solution



No idea how to begin this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At terminal velocity, the force of drag is equal to the gravitational force.

F_{drag}=-bv^2=...
 
'b' is a characteristic dimension, such as the distance from front to rear bumper for an automobile attempting to fly.

You managed to leave out a square root in your equation.
 
Phrak said:
'b' is a characteristic dimension, such as the distance from front to rear bumper for an automobile attempting to fly.

You managed to leave out a square root in your equation.

Which equation?
 
cleverfield said:
Which equation?

From the one meta kindly put up
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top