Terrorist Attack hits London, City on Alert

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
A series of confirmed terrorist attacks in London involved multiple explosions targeting the city's infrastructure, with reports of at least six blasts on the Underground and one on a bus. Eyewitness accounts describe chaos but no widespread panic, and initial casualty reports suggest several fatalities, with numbers potentially rising. Speculation surrounds the motives for the attacks, with some attributing them to the ongoing Iraq war and others suggesting a connection to the upcoming G8 summit or the 2012 Olympics. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has labeled the incidents as "barbaric" and indicated that they are likely linked to terrorist organizations, possibly Al-Qaeda. The situation has led to significant disruptions in public transport and emergency services in London.
  • #31
Really sick people :mad:. I'm not leaving the house today.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
They say it had to have been planned for days so there's no way it was for the olympic decision unless they planted bombs in paris and london and maybe NYC which is just highly unlikely.
 
  • #33
well, but we can also say that the news of Olympics 2012 made the bomb planning earlier than scheduled.
 
  • #34
El Hombre Invisible said:
Personally I'd go with G8 as the reason for the timing, not the Olympics.
And there were 7 explosions, did the 8th not go off? makes you wonder..
 
  • #35
Wow, 2 people dead. Why is this even making the news? Do you have any idea how frequently 2 people die just of natural causes in London? Every ten minutes.
 
  • #36
BicycleTree said:
Wow, 2 people dead. Why is this even making the news? Do you have any idea how frequently 2 people die just of natural causes in London? Every ten minutes.
Are you serious? How often do people die due to a bombing in London, sure there is news value. And do expect for that number to go up.
 
  • #37
BicycleTree said:
Wow, 2 people dead. Why is this even making the news? Do you have any idea how frequently 2 people die just of natural causes in London? Every ten minutes.

Get a grip.

2 people confirmed dead. There are still people in ambulances, casualty, operating theatres, and even stuck in tunnels. There have been four confirmed explosions, do you not see this as even a minor event?
 
  • #38
According to BBC on TV and on their website, there were 6, not 7, explosions.
 
  • #39
The actual number of explosions has been confused by wounded people emerging from different underground stations, where the explosions did not happen at stations themselves but in the tunnels between them.
 
  • #40
To go up? To what? Five dead? Wow, it would shock me if five people died in London. Although it happens every twenty-five minutes. I guess I get shocked easily.

Yeah, I'm not literally surprised that this is making the news. I am asking why people think stuff like this is important. Two people dead is not even remotely statistically significant. Move on to issues like obesity--now that is significant. Terrorism has a lot less chance of hurting the Western world than big macs do.
 
  • #41
BicycleTree said:
To go up? To what? Five dead? Wow, it would shock me if five people died in London. Although it happens every twenty-five minutes. I guess I get shocked easily.

Yeah, I'm not literally surprised that this is making the news. I am asking why people think stuff like this is important. Two people dead is not even remotely statistically significant. Move on to issues like obesity--now that is significant. Terrorism has a lot less chance of hurting the Western world than big macs do.

I don't think this is the right time to belittle the horrible events which happened this morning.
 
  • #42
We got another a-hole in my home forum saying a few people dead is trivial... what's with people?
 
  • #43
BicycleTree said:
To go up? To what? Five dead? Wow, it would shock me if five people died in London. Although it happens every twenty-five minutes. I guess I get shocked easily.

Yeah, I'm not literally surprised that this is making the news. I am asking why people think stuff like this is important. Two people dead is not even remotely statistically significant. Move on to issues like obesity--now that is significant. Terrorism has a lot less chance of hurting the Western world than big macs do.
I try to avoid replying to posts like this, but I'll make an exception. The news is that a terrorist attack has occurred in London, not that two people have just died. There are hundreds of people injured in hospital and many more trapped in the Underground. '2' people have been confirmed dead (actually 6 now). That does not mean only two people have died. We'll have to wait to get the final count and I HOPE it is not much more than what we've already heard but I fear otherwise. Anyway, it is a significant story to appear in the news, unless you think deliberate killing of innocent people is particularly boring. Yes, it happens - and it's usually in the news. Now, out of respect for those already bereaved, and those who may soon find out they are bereaved, will you please keep your off-hand and quite frankly appalling remarks in your head.
 
  • #44
BicycleTree said:
To go up? To what? Five dead? Wow, it would shock me if five people died in London. Although it happens every twenty-five minutes. I guess I get shocked easily.

Yeah, I'm not literally surprised that this is making the news. I am asking why people think stuff like this is important. Two people dead is not even remotely statistically significant. Move on to issues like obesity--now that is significant. Terrorism has a lot less chance of hurting the Western world than big macs do.
You're being utterly utterly ridiculous and insensitive. If you don't think it's important then don't post about it. Not only have there been loads of casualties, it's also brought London to a complete standstill and has people all over shocked and panicking about people who might've been hurt. Bugger off out of this thread.
 
  • #45
Even if fifty people died, it would not shock me. I would shake my head at the terrorists' stupidity and aggression. But as far as respect for the bereaved--do you have any idea how frequently fifty people die worldwide? You can calculate it out easily. Do you go around in a constant state of respect for those bereaved? Of course not--you simply go about your life.
 
  • #46
Fifty people die worldwide in somewhat less than twenty seconds.
 
  • #47
Well, I got a paper to write now but always keep a sense of perspective. You should be respecting the far greater number of people currently grieving those dead of obesity and related illnesses, not inciting yourself and those around you about a statistically insignificant "threat" that has virtually no chance of hurting you or those you love.
 
  • #48
BicycleTree said:
Even if fifty people died, it would not shock me. I would shake my head at the terrorists' stupidity and aggression. But as far as respect for the bereaved--do you have any idea how frequently fifty people die worldwide? You can calculate it out easily. Do you go around in a constant state of respect for those bereaved? Of course not--you simply go about your life.
No, but nor do I go around asking those who've just spent the last hour making sure all their friends are still alive why they find this newsworthy. I'm not asking you to feel anything - just get out of people's faces with your flippant disregard for human life and people's feelings. You are disgusting all of us.
 
  • #49
BicycleTree said:
To go up? To what? Five dead? Wow, it would shock me if five people died in London. Although it happens every twenty-five minutes. I guess I get shocked easily.

Yeah, I'm not literally surprised that this is making the news. I am asking why people think stuff like this is important. Two people dead is not even remotely statistically significant. Move on to issues like obesity--now that is significant. Terrorism has a lot less chance of hurting the Western world than big macs do.

If you really want to talk numbers and statistics you have to compare not the simple (yet horrible) fact that people died, but rather how they died. The day before this happened, did anyone die of bomb attacks - no, the following day, even if only five people, died that's 5X the number that died the previous day. That seems very significant from a numbers standpoint, but tossing around numbers and stats really belittles that fact that innocent people died and that's wrong. I can see your point BT, but it's still in poor taste given the circumstances. My heart goes out to those who have lost in this unfortunate situation.
 
  • #50
BicycleTree said:
Well, I got a paper to write now but always keep a sense of perspective. You should be respecting the far greater number of people currently grieving those dead of obesity and related illnesses, not inciting yourself and those around you about a statistically insignificant "threat" that has virtually no chance of hurting you or those you love.
Those who die from obesity were not murdered indiscrimantely by people they have no qualm with - they die due to their own inability to look after they're own health! It is you who needs a sense of perspective.
 
  • #51
BT, I think it would be prudent to shut up, and keep your thoughtless comments to yourselves. Yes, people die all the time, no it doesn't usually make the news, and yes it's sad.

What is your point? That a terrorist attack shouldn't make the news? That it's to be put down to part of everyday life, and shouldn't even be discussed? Please keep your thoughtless comments to yourself, at least until people know that their families and friends are safe.
 
  • #52
El Hombre Invisible said:
Those who die from obesity were not murdered indiscrimantely by people they have no qualm with - they die due to their own inability to look after they're own health! It is you who needs a sense of perspective.

exactly! People die of cancer, people die of lung disease, people die falling on stairs, people die in car accidents. Accidents happen. But this was no accident. Its not the same as getting blown up from a bomb on your bus on your way to work.

As brewnog just said, this still must be talked about. Are you saying that everytime a bus blows up or maybe an airplane runs into a building, that no one should care and it shoudlnt be reported because "people die everyday".
 
  • #53
Latest news: # of explosions only 4... not sure if that's four in the underground alone or three on the underground and one on the bus, but it affected 7 stations.
 
  • #54
Theres 2 numbers being given out, 7 and 4. 4 probably is wrong because they both agree 3 bombs went off in the subway but I've seen at least 2 buses with bad damage.
 
  • #55
Pengwuino said:
Theres 2 numbers being given out, 7 and 4. 4 probably is wrong because they both agree 3 bombs went off in the subway but I've seen at least 2 buses with bad damage.

It seems there were three underground explosions but people emerged from several different stations, where the ambulances picked them up. The figure of 7 was stated by the emergency services, presumably they counted each cluster of victims as an individual incident.

I've seen two separate pictures (taken from different angles) of the same bus, on which the fourth explosion occured. I'm not aware of a second bus.

In any case, irrespective of the number or severity of incidents, it's truly horrible, and only time will reveal how many peoples' lives have been ruined as a result of this mornings' events.
 
Last edited:
  • #56
BicycleTree said:
To go up? To what? Five dead? Wow, it would shock me if five people died in London. Although it happens every twenty-five minutes. I guess I get shocked easily.

Yeah, I'm not literally surprised that this is making the news. I am asking why people think stuff like this is important. Two people dead is not even remotely statistically significant. Move on to issues like obesity--now that is significant. Terrorism has a lot less chance of hurting the Western world than big macs do.

This is the biggest stupidity I have ever heard in this forum. I have been surprised of your lack of heart. I have been surprised how the hell there are prehistoric people like you on the Earth's ground.

The main difference between such ridiculous illness you have been come across and a terrorist bombing is that in the second case there are criminal people who takes away your innocent life because of unknown or political issues which are scarcely concerned to population. The death people in London were not politicians nor soldiers and have never used a weapon against Iraq. Also they don't manage the economic politics of G8. They were workers. And they have been indiscriminately assasined. That's the most terrible thing it can happen to a country.
 
  • #57
brewnog said:
It seems there were three underground explosions but people emerged from several different stations, where the ambulances picked them up. The figure of 7 was stated by the emergency services, presumably they counted each cluster of victims as an individual incident.

I've seen two separate pictures (taken from different angles) of the same bus, on which the fourth explosion occured. I'm not aware of a second bus.

I read that first part right as someone on TV was sayen the exact same thing.

I saw 2 buses though i swear. I saw one bus with the top part blown off but it was verticle. I also remember way early that skynews was circling a bus that was on its side and the front half was blown off.
 
  • #58
Yeah, I think the 7 came from explosions affected 7 stations. Some of those stations were close together though, and it is a tunnel after all. One bus as far as the news is saying.
 
  • #59
Well AP is saying 40 are dead now. Thankfully nothing more has happened. Everyone kept saying this was probably only the beginning.
 
  • #60
My heart goes out to everyone in London. Hope everybody's friends and families are safe. When will these terrorist attacks ever stop? It seems like every time the world recovers from one, there is another attack.
Sunayana.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
14K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 634 ·
22
Replies
634
Views
47K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K