Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A Test if 2nd order diff eq. can be derived from a Hamiltonian

  1. Feb 11, 2017 #1
    Imagine I have a complicated second-order differential equation that I strongly suspect can be derived from a Hamiltonian (with additional momentum dependence beyond p2/2m, so the momentum is not simply mv, but I don't know what it is).

    Are there any ways to test whether or not the given second order differential equation can be derived from a Hamiltonian without finding what it is?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 13, 2017 #2

    hilbert2

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    If the potential energy of the system doesn't have an infinity (like in the potential of two point charges: ##V(r)\propto r^{-1}##), you can try to form a general Lagrangian function

    ##L =\sum_{k,l=0}^\infty c(k,l)\dot{q}^{k}q^{l}##

    where the ##c(k,l)## are constant coefficients, and calculate the corresponding eq. of motion and find by comparison what Lagrangian corresponds to you DE. However, if there's fractional powers of x and p in the equation, this probably isn't so easy.
     
  4. Feb 13, 2017 #3
    This has been my approach. I should have added that the additional terms are a perturbation, so I'm trying to achieve even just the simpler goal of matching terms to the next order in epsilon. Even so, I'm only close in a simple case, and in complicated cases it seems hopeless to get everything to match up (it's not a 1 degree of freedom problem, and there are many terms to simultaneously match).

    So I was trying to think if there's a more clever, non-brute-force method. Something like trying to numerically integrate the equations of motion and somehow checking the dimensionality of the manifold on which the trajectories move to check for conserved quantities. I hoped though that there might be something simpler....like connecting the differential equation to some sort of canonical transformation and checking whether a symplectic criterion is satisfied...

    Thanks for any thoughts!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Test if 2nd order diff eq. can be derived from a Hamiltonian
Loading...