Test Light Aberration in Warehouse: Laze Light & Curtain 50m

  • Thread starter Thread starter einsteinooo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an experiment conducted in a warehouse using a Laze light and curtain positioned 50 meters apart to test light aberration. It is theorized that due to the Earth's movement, the light point should shift by 5 mm over a 12-hour period, resulting in a total movement of 10 mm after 24 hours. However, the experiment did not show any movement of the light point, raising questions about the presence of aberration phenomena on the ground. Participants express confusion regarding the relevance of the Earth's speed to the warehouse experiment and request clarification on the methodology. The conversation highlights the need for clearer communication and understanding of the experimental setup.
einsteinooo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
experiment in the warehouse

Using a Laze light and curtain far from it 50 m. It is supposed that A is a light centre when having no aberration phenomenon. Because the Earth moves at the speed of 30 km/s, therefore, at any period, the aberration phenomenon will happen at maximum - light point askew 5 mm in comparison with A for any side. 12 hours later, when the Earth rotates 1/2 revolution, the aberration phenomenon will happen at maximum - light point askew 5 mm in comparison with A for the reverse side. In spite of not knowing which thing is light point centre A when having no aberration phenomenon, but when observing for 24 hours, we will see that the light point moves a distance of 10 mm. The above test has been done but the light point hasn't moved. Therefore, is there aberration phenomenon on the ground ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand the "test" you are describing. What is the relevance of the Earth's speed if the test is done in a warehouse? Please describe the exact situation clearly.

If you are describing an actual experiment, please provide a published reference.
 
I'm a Vietnamese. I don't speak Einglish
 
einsteinooo said:
I'm a Vietnamese. I don't speak Einglish

Then you need to figure out how to present and clarify the question, because it isn't clear.

Zz.
 
I don't know ! Can who speak Vietnamese ?
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top