Test of two distributions/functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter phonic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
phonic
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

I have two functions that are defined on a table, i.e. f1(x,y), f2(x,y), where x and y are bin indices, and 1\leq f1(x,y) \leq 1, 1\leq f2(x,y) \leq 1.

I would like to perform some test to show whether f1(x,y) and f2(x,y) are significantly different. Is there some way to do this? I thought of using chi square test for f1(x,y)+n and f2(x,y)+n, where n>1 is a constant added to make f1(x,y) and f2(x,y) interpretable as frequencies.

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phonic said:
I thought of using chi square test for f1(x,y)+n and f2(x,y)+n, where n>1 is a constant added to make f1(x,y) and f2(x,y) interpretable as frequencies.

Statistical signficance is not a meaningful concept unless you are dealing with a phenomena that involves probability. To do the usual type of "hypothesis testing" , you must assume the two functions are generated by the same probabalistic process. Until you state exactly what that process is, it isn't possible to say what sort of statistical test is appropriate.

For example if we assume each table is generated by one realization of the uniform [0,1] random variable u according to the formula f(i,j) = (-0.5)(i) - (0.5)(j) + u then it wouldn't make sense to do a chi square test.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top